Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;107(4):789–795. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1294

Table 2.

Preventive attitudes toward visceral leishmaniasis among study participants (N = 210)

Variable Patients with VL, n (%) Patients with HIV/VL, n (%)
Is VL completely curable?
 Yes* 55 (42.7) 32 (38.1)
 No 24 (19.0) 22 (26.2)
 Don’t know 47 (37.3) 30 (35.7)
Is the outcome of VL fatal if untreated?
 Yes* 72 (57.1) 54 (64.3)
 No 13 (10.3) 11 (13.1)
Don’t know 41 (32.5) 19 (22.6)
Is it possible to control VL through community participation?
 Yes* 50 (39.7) 34 (40.5)
 No 20 (15.9) 19 (22.6)
 Don’t know 56 (44.4) 31 (36.9)
Are people with HIV more vulnerable to kala-azar?
 Yes* 38 (30.2) 43 (51.2)
 No 23 (18.3) 11 (13.1)
 Don’t know 65 (51.6) 30 (35.7)
Does living with a VL-infected person raise the risk of getting a VL infection?
 Yes* 51 (40.5) 37 (44)
 No 28 (22.2) 18 (21.5)
 Don’t know 47 (37.3) 29 (34.5)
Does an early diagnosis help with VL treatment?
 Yes* 80 (63.5) 56 (66.7)
 No 10 (7.9) 7 (8.3)
 Don’t know 36 (65.1) 21 (25.0)
Does inconsistent treatment affect recovery?
 Yes* 69 (54.8) 50 (59.5)
 No 20 (15.9) 11 (13.1)
 Don’t know 37 (29.4) 23 (27.4)
Where is your preferred place of treatment?
 Public sector* 82 (65.1) 58 (69.0)
 Private sector 20 (15.9) 13 (15.5)
 Other 24 (28.6) 13 (25)
Overall attitude
 Positive 54 (42.9) 41 (48.8)
 Negative 72 (57.1) 43 (51.2)
Mean score, point 3.93 ± 2.22 4.31 ± 2.12
P value 0.225

VL = visceral leishmaniasis.

*

The correct response was assigned a score of 1 point; other responses were scored 0 point.