Table 4.

Indirect effects of border site residence on alcohol use disorder symptoms via neighborhood risk factors

	Current drinkers (N = 1690)		Male drinkers (N = 937)		Female drinkers (N = 753)
	B (SE)	P-value	B (SE)	P-value	B (SE)	P-value
Laredo (versus San Antonio)
General neighborhood insecurity	−0.008 (0.02)	0.606	−0.011 (0.02)	0.632	0.001 (0.02)	0.961
Neighborhood crime victimization	0.000 (0.02)	0.990	−0.003 (0.03)	0.930	0.002 (0.02)	0.890
Witnessing neighborhood crime	0.054 (0.04)	0.146	0.092 (0.06)	0.140	0.016 (0.03)	0.511
Neighborhood drug availability	0.031 (0.04)	0.396	0.074 (0.07)	0.276	−0.038 (0.04)	0.356
Off-premise alcohol outlet density	0.003 (0.01)	0.817	0.001 (0.01)	0.901	0.002 (0.01)	0.858
On-premise alcohol outlet density	0.006 (0.01)	0.679	0.015 (0.03)	0.595	−0.006 (0.02)	0.745
Disadvantaged residents	−0.094 (0.05)	0.054	−0.057 (0.06)	0.354	−0.135 (0.06)	0.018
Residential instability	0.009 (0.01)	0.481	0.026 (0.03)	0.329	0.001 (0.01)	0.805
% White/non-Hispanic	0.205 (0.08)	0.012	0.229 (0.13)	0.068	0.216 (0.08)	0.008
	B (SE)	P-value	B (SE)	P-value	B (SE)	P-value
Brownsville/McAllen (versus San Antonio)
General neighborhood insecurity	−0.074 (0.07)	0.325	−0.057 (0.12)	0.627	−0.105 (0.06)	0.086
Neighborhood crime victimization	0.064 (0.04)	0.087	0.110 (0.07)	0.108	0.043 (0.03)	0.206
Witnessing neighborhood crime	−0.160 (0.08)	0.040	−0.258 (0.13)	0.050	−0.053 (0.08)	0.484
Neighborhood drug availability	−0.043 (0.04)	0.307	−0.122 (0.07)	0.090	0.044 (0.05)	0.328
Off-premise alcohol outlet density	−0.010 (0.03)	0.714	−0.006 (0.04)	0.888	−0.007 (0.03)	0.794
On-premise alcohol outlet density	0.001 (0.01)	0.932	0.007 (0.03)	0.774	0.002 (0.01)	0.862
Disadvantaged residents	0.029 (0.04)	0.467	0.039 (0.05)	0.428	−0.004 (0.05)	0.937
Residential instability	0.013 (0.02)	0.410	0.048 (0.04)	0.254	−0.000 (0.00)	0.935
% White/non-Hispanic	0.075 (0.05)	0.117	0.056 (0.06)	0.332	0.106 (0.05)	0.040

Notes. Bold font indicates P-value < 0.05; italics indicate P-value < 0.10.