Table 4. Performance of AIDRScreening with different camera types among the included eyes.
| RDR detection | Topcon TRC-50DX | Zeiss Visucam FF450 | Topcon TRC-NW400 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 95% CI | Value | 95% CI | Value | 95% CI | |||
| Sensitivity | 83.33% | 62.62–95.26% | 86.38% | 82.00–90.77% | 87.86% | 82.45–93.27% | ||
| Specificity | 96.15% | 80.36–99.90% | 96.42% | 94.58–98.26% | 95.21% | 91.74–98.67% | ||
| Accuracy | 90.00% | 78.19–96.67% | 92.65% | 90.61–94.70% | 91.61% | 88.40–94.82% | ||
| PPV | 95.24% | 76.18–99.88% | 93.55% | 90.28–96.82% | 94.62% | 90.74–98.50% | ||
| NPV | 86.21% | 68.34–96.11% | 92.18% | 89.57–94.78% | 89.10% | 84.21–93.99% | ||
| PLR | 21.67 | 3.14–149.31 | 24.13 | 14.39–40.45 | 18.32 | 8.87–37.85 | ||
| NLR | 0.17 | 0.07–0.43 | 0.14 | 0.10–0.19 | 0.13 | 0.08–0.20 | ||
| OR | 127.47 | – | 172.36 | – | 140.92 | – | ||
CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likely ratio; NLP, negative likely ratio; OR, odds ratio.