Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2022 Jun;22(2):573–580. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i2.66

Towards developing a comprehensive treatment schedule for patients with cerebral palsy: factors influencing patient's adherence to physiotherapy treatment

Chigozie Uchenwoke Ikenna 1, Chidimma Ofodum Mirian 1, Chinonso Nwachukwu Paul 1, Christiana Osuoha Onyekachi 1, Kenechukwu Okonkwo Kingsley 1, Lynda Anih Chidera 1
PMCID: PMC9652679  PMID: 36407377

Abstract

Purpose

This study is aimed to identify factors influencing patient's adherence to treatment in a bid to characterize the extent to which these factors are considered while developing a treatment schedule for patients with cerebral palsy in Nigeria

Methods

Descriptive cross-sectional study of physiotherapists involved in the care of patients with cerebral palsy. Factors influencing treatment adherence were assessed using a pre-tested, self-administered questionnaire. Participants were sampled from physiotherapists working at University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu State, Nigeria. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of percentage and frequencies.

Results

A total of fifty three (31 males and 22 females) physiotherapists completed and returned the questionnaire. Participants (84.9%) agreed that patients occasionally forget to meet up with their appointment days; with majority of them agreeing that distance to the clinic and economic factor (cost of treatment and transportation) influence patient's adherence to treatment. Presence/absence of a caregiver and relationship between patients and their physiotherapist are also important factors influencing patient's treatment schedules.

Conclusion

Distance to the clinic when compared to other (economic, patient-therapist relationship) factors is the major barrier to patient's adherence to treatment and therefore should be considered while developing treatment schedules for patients with cerebral palsy

Keywords: Cerebral palsy, Treatment schedule, Adherence, Physiotherapy, Nigeria

Introduction

Cerebral Palsy (CP), a group of movement and posture disorders attributed to non-progressive disturbance that occurs in a developing infant/fetal brain1; is the most common motor disability in childhood ranging from 1.5 to more than 4 per 1000 live births2, 3, 4, 5 in occurrence. CP displays variation in presentation, etiology, evolution, severity, comorbidities and outcomes,6 thus emphasizing the need for individualized medical and rehabilitative interventions which has the potential to help children with CP engage in meaningful life activities.

CP management requires a multi-disciplinary approach in which physiotherapy plays a vital role in7. The goal of physiotherapy is to help patients with cerebral palsy achieve their potential of physical independence and fitness levels within their community while improving their quality of life and those of their caregivers who have a major role to play in the process7. By developing a comprehensive treatment plan and schedule according to the specific needs of patients, a physiotherapist addresses limitation of mobility and achieve optimal results in patients with cerebral palsy. Treatment schedule, a vital part of cerebral palsy intervention constitutes a standard list of appropriate interventions to be used, how it is administered and how often (such as daily or weekly) the therapy would be required8. Treatment schedule is greatly associated to the prognosis and effectiveness of physiotherapy management9 underscoring the need for such schedules to be strictly followed as planned. Failure to keep scheduled clinical appointments has negative implications and is being reported to disrupt clinic workflow, stimulate negative clinician attitudes, hinder the delivery of optimal quality care and cause premature discontinuation of clinical service10. In other words, a well-planned treatment schedule can be marred by poor adherence, thus resulting to a poor treatment outcome, recovery time and quality of life.

Since children with cerebral palsy and other developmental disabilities require long term rehabilitation programs and complex management regimes11 in which they are largely expected to be adherent to; a crucial step in improving adherence to physiotherapy treatment of such patients is to ensure that the treatment schedules are consciously developed in such a way to encourage patient's adherence. Identifying the factors which could influence patient's adherence is pertinent in informing treatment schedules decision. Essentially, factors such as severity of the condition, distance to the clinic, economic status of patient, age of patient12 have been considered to play a key role in determining adherence and subsequently; the treatment schedule for patients with cerebral palsy. However, there is no evidence suggesting that these factors are well appreciated and considered by physiotherapists while scheduling patients' appointments and schedules especially for children with cerebral palsy. The lack of a comprehensive guideline for developing treatment schedules for patients with cerebral palsy which features these variables have implications in the level of patient's compliance to treatment and hinders uniformity in patient's management. Therefore, as a crucial step towards developing a comprehensive treatment schedules for patients with cerebral palsy, this study aims to identify factors influencing patient's adherence to treatment in a bid to characterize the extent to which these factors are considered while developing a treatment schedule for patients with cerebral palsy in Nigeria

Methods

Study Site

This study was conducted in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria. An average of 12–15 patients with cerebral palsy are managed daily in the hospital.

Study Design

A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was employed.

Study Participants

A minimum sample size of fifty-six (56) participants (physiotherapists) was achieved from a population size of sixty physiotherapists working in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku/Ozalla. In order to achieve this sample size, all physiotherapists working in the above-named hospital were recruited as it acts a major referral centre in the Eastern Nigeria and individuals who were not willing to sign the informed consent form were excluded from the study.

Data Collection

Physiotherapists working at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital were approached for written consent after the purpose of the study was adequately explained. A pre-tested self-administered questionnaire was utilized to determine factors influencing the treatment schedule of patients with cerebral palsy. The questionnaire is divided into two sections: the first section contains the sociodemographic characteristics of participants while the second part constitutes specific questions addressing factors that can influence adherence. The questionnaire was prepared after a robust literature review with face validity of the questionnaire assessed by the authors to ensure that it answered its set objectives. Pre-testing of the questionnaire was done among physiotherapists from a nearby state government facility who were not included in this study. Sixty copies of the questionnaire were printed and distributed to the participants and they were given five days to answer the questions after which the questionnaires were retrieved for data analysis.

Ethical Considerations

The ethical approval was sought and obtained from the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Nigeria. Participation was entirely voluntary, and authors ensured confidentiality as codes were used as personal identifiers rather than participants' names.

Method of data analysis

Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21. Software. Description statistics of percentage and frequency were used to summarize participant's demographic characteristics and questions pertaining to factors influencing treatment schedules of patients with cerebral palsy.

Results

Sixty copies of the questionnaire were distributed to physiotherapists in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital. However, a total of fifty-three (53) physiotherapist responded to the survey yielding a response rate of 88%. The highest number of responses were found among male physiotherapists, aged between 21–30 years and have been in practice for 6–10 years. Details are found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic Characteristics of Participants

Variables Frequency Cumulative frequency Percentage %
21–25 5 5 9.4
Age (Years) 26–30 17 22 32.1
31–35 9 31 17.0
36–40 10 41 18.9
41–45 6 47 11.3
46–50 5 52 9.4
> 50 1 53 1.9
Gender Male 31 31 58.5
Female 22 53 41.5
Rank Physiotherapist 21 21 39.6
Senior PT 20 41 37.7
Principal PT 7 48 13.2
Chief PT 5 53 9.4
Years of practice 1–5 20 21 39.6
6–10 21 41 37.7
11–15 1 42 1.9
16–20 4 46 7.5
21–25 5 51 9.4
26–30 1 52 1.9
>30 1 53 1.9

PT- Physiotherapist

Factors influencing patient's adherence

The perceived factors influencing the treatment schedules of patients with cerebral palsy are illustrated in Table 2. The factors were broadly grouped into patient's compliance, economic, distance and patient-therapist relationship factors. Participants stated their opinions on the various sub-questions of the broad questions using a 5-point Likert scale.

Table 2.

Factors influencing patient's adherence

Variables Strongly
agree
Agree No
Opinion
Disagree Strongly
Disagree
Patient's
adherence
Does your patient attend appointments
fixed by physiotherapist?
56.6%(30) 34.0%(18) 1.9%(1) 7.5%(4) 0
Does your patient attend weekly
appointments?
52.8%(28) 47.2%(25) 0 0 0
Does your patient attend the appointments
more than twice a month?
73.6%(39) 26.4%(14) 0 0 0
Do your patients occasionally, forget to
come on the treatment schedule days?
26.4%(14) 58.5%(31) 5.7%(3) 9.4%(5) 0
Distance
related
factors
Does the distance of the clinic affect your
patient coming for treatment
35.8%(19) 52.8%(28) 3.8%(2) 7.5%(4) 0
Does the absence of caregiver sometimes
prevent your patient from coming to clinic
58.5%(31) 39.6%(21) 0 1.9%(1) 0
Economic
factor
Does transportation cost influence your
patient from coming for treatment?
45.3%(24) 54.7%(29) 0 0 0
Does cost of treatment influence your
patient from coming for treatment?
45.3%(24) 47.2%(25) 7.5%(4) 0 0
Patient-
therapist
relationship
Do your patients perceive the treatment to
have negative effect on him/her?
0 0 11.3%(6) 56.6%(30) 32.1%(17)
Do your patients find the treatment
duration to be longer than it should be
9.4%(5) 34.0%(18) 9.4%(5) 0 0
Does the patient therapist relationship
affect your treatment plans
15.1%(8) 52.8%(28) 5.7%(3) 0 0

Regarding the patient's compliance factors, a majority (30, 56%) of the respondents strongly agreed that patients attend fixed appointments, either weekly or for up twice or more than in a month. Majority (31, 58.5%) of the participants also agreed that patients occasionally forget to come on treatment schedule days. With respect to the distance related factors, a huge number of participants (31, 58.5%) agreed that distance of the clinic and absence of caregivers prevents patient's coming for treatment. From the participants' point of view; treatment (25, 47.2%) and transportation (29, 54.7%) costs prevents patients from coming to the clinic. Respondents also agreed (28, 52.8%) that their relationship with patients affect their treatment plans and disagreed (30, 56.6%) that their patients perceive the treatment have negative effect on them. 5 (9.4%) and 18 (34.0%) of the respondents respectively strongly agreed and agreed that patients find the treatment duration to be longer than it should be. Details are found in Table 2.

Discussion

This study presents findings on the extent in which some factors influence patient's adherence to physiotherapy treatment, hence the development of treatment schedules by their physiotherapists. Participants' responses were obtained based on four broad factors which are likely to influence patients' adherence to treatment and as a result inform the therapist's decision on developing a treatment schedule for them. They agreed to varying extents that distance related factors and economic factors (transportation and cost of treatment) prevent patients from attending their treatment sessions.

Compliance level factors

From a physiotherapy context, an adherent behavior constitutes attending clinical appointment, actively participating in rehabilitation activities during clinical appointments, carrying out home programs, avoiding contraindicated activities and using recommended protective or therapeutic device13. However, this study laid emphasis on an adherent behavior which constitutes attending clinical appointments. Forgetfulness has been reported as a major cause of non-compliance to clinic appointments14, 15, 16 and findings from this study shows that patients miss their appointment days due to forgetfulness consequently hindering the delivery of optimal care. Other factors which can lead to poor adherence to physiotherapy treatment includes, an inadequate knowledge of caregivers' on the role of physiotherapy in cerebral palsy management and how they perceive the relevance of and adherence to the treatment programs. If parents/caregivers attach a negligible importance to these factors, it could lead to forgetfulness and poor behavior towards treatment adherence. With respect to children with cerebral palsy, the onus of adherence to treatment lies with the caregivers or parents, highlighting the importance of factoring in patient's treatment schedules; an intervention focused on parents' education to improve their knowledge and ability to adhere to these treatment programs. Interventions such as peer support relationship can be effective in enabling patients adopt a positive attitude to treatment and adherence; mobile phone reminders/texts for the purpose of curbing forgetfulness thus boosting adherence. hese factors ought to be considered while developing treatment schedules for patients with cerebral palsy.

Distance-related factor

Distance to clinic could also be a major reason why patients fail to come for treatment. Persons living with disabilities17 and cerebral palsy experience greater barriers to accessing health services when compared to their counterparts. Most health facilities in Nigeria are located in urban areas partly due to resource constraints hence warranting people living in rural areas to travel long distances in a bid to access health care. There is also an added burden of bad roads and poor road networks. Distance barriers specifically lead to rescheduling of treatment appointment, delay of treatment and missed treatment session. All these could culminate to poor adherence to treatment, management and thus, health outcomes. Distance as barrier to health services becomes much burdensome to patients with low income18 highlighting the relationship between socioeconomic and distance related factors of patient's adherence. Thus, governments should revamp road networks and open up health facilities at the rural areas to foster easier access and referral based on proximity issues. Clinicians on the other hand, should put this into consideration while developing treatment schedules for such patients and also discuss with the patients on probable ways of minimizing the chances of missed appointments.

Economic status factor

Low economic status and lack of income are important risk factors of non-adherence to different treatments19,20. This is also evidenced in our findings as majority of participants strongly agreed that the cost of treatment influenced their patients from coming for treatment. These findings showed that healthcare expenditure comprising of cost of treatment and transportation could constitute a large portion of living expenses for patients with cerebral palsy. Cost and income are two interrelated factors. Healthcare cost is less burden when the patient has a relatively high income or health insurance. Specifically, a number of studies indicated that patients who had no insurance cover21, 22, 23 or who had low income 24, 25 may not likely comply to the treatment schedule days due to the cost for treatment. They are also likely to have a relatively worse self-reported health, suffer from more chronic conditions and have a lower life expectancy because of limited access to health care due to cost and coverage26. Noted in this study is the additional burden of transportation cost. Affordability and availability of transport to health facilities, coupled with prolonged travel time pose as a barrier to accessing health care27 and hence influences patient's adherence to treatment. Therefore, healthcare providers should be aware of patient's economic situation28 and also be at par with the active projects in place to reduce the socioeconomic and access to health care disparities in the country.

Patient-Therapist relationship factors

It is quite satisfying that a good number of the respondents disagreed that their patients do perceive the treatment to have negative effect on them. Patient's perception of therapeutic benefits, patient's beliefs, motivation and attitude towards therapy were identified as factors to be included in influencing treatment compliance. Misconceptions or erroneous beliefs held by patients could contribute to poor compliance to appointment12. Specifically, patient's worries about the treatment, believing that the disease is controllable or attributing it to religious belief might add to the likelihood that they are unable to adhere to their treatment appointment. Negative attitude towards therapy (depression, anxiety, perceived feeling of exacerbation of symptoms, fears etc.) and their compliance to treatment schedules29, 30, 22, 31. Our findings also showed that parents agreed that their treatment duration were longer than it should be. When patients were worried that their duration of treatment is lengthy, they were likely to have poor compliance to the appointment days28,32. Proper scheduling strategies could be utilised to ensure that patient load per time doesn't exceed the staff strength of the paediatric unit. Failure to resolve this may lead to patients clustering and waiting for a longer period of time. All these aforementioned factors can be addressed by fostering a good patient-therapist relationship. Patient-therapist relationship is a strong factor which affects patients' compliance to treatment29, 24, 35, 36, 37. A healthy relationship is based on patient's trust in their clinicians especially with delivering positive benefits for patients with cerebral palsy. Studies have found that patient response to treatment is good when therapists are emotionally supportive, giving reassurance or respect, and treating patients as an equal partner38, 39. In this study, majority of the respondents strongly believed that patient-therapist relationship affects their treatment plans. However, focus should be further channeled in ensuring the development and maintenance of a good patient-therapist relationship. These findings demonstrate the need for cooperation between patients and clinician and the importance of good communication. Communication between parents and their therapists is pertinent because it will avail a conducive environment for educating them on the need to adopt and maintain a positive behavior to health and treatment. Poor communication with the healthcare providers was also likely to cause a negative effect on patient's level of compliance to treatment appointment40, 28. To build a good and healthy patient-therapist relationship, physiotherapist should have patients involved in designing their treatment goals and plan37,41 and give patients a detailed explanation about the condition and treatment42, 31.

There are a few limitations in this study. First, this study presents findings from a single tertiary hospital that serves as the major referral center in South-Eastern Nigeria. It does not represent the general population of physiotherapists in Nigeria, hence findings from this study should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, this study focused on attending clinical appointments as an adherent behavior. However, a more holistic assessment of patient's adherence to physiotherapy treatment including actively participating in rehabilitation activities during clinical appointments, carrying out home programs, avoiding contraindicated activities and using recommended protective or therapeutic devices is recommended. Future research is also encouraged to explore other factors such as increased workload and specific goals of recovery as an indices for outcome of therapy which were not featured in this study.

Conclusion

Findings from this study indicates that factors such as economic status of patients and relationship between patients and their therapists; with the distance to the clinic playing a key role; influence treatment adherence for patients with cerebral palsy. It is also pertinent that patients adopt a positive behavior towards health as it could influence the treatment plans of such patients. These factors should be therefore be considered while developing a comprehensive treatment schedule for patients with cerebral palsy. Finally, factors influencing patients with cerebral palsy adherence to their treatment schedules should be explored and assessed from the parent's/caregiver's viewpoint.

References

  • 1.Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, Dan B, Jacobsson B. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007 Feb 1;109(suppl 109):8–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arneson CL, Durkin MS, Benedict RE, Kirby RS, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Braun KV, Doernberg NS. Prevalence of cerebral palsy: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, three sites, United States, 2004. Disability and health journal. 2009 Jan 1;2(1):45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bhasin TK, Brocksen S, Avchen RN, Van Naarden Braun K. Prevalence of four developmental disabilities among children aged 8 years; Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance Program, 1996 and 2000. [PubMed]
  • 4.Paneth N, Hong T, Korzeniewski S. The descriptive epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Clinics in perinatology. 2006 Jun 1;33(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Winter S, Autry A, Boyle C, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy in a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2002 Dec 1;110(6):1220–1225. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.6.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shevell M, Miller SP, Scherer SW, Yager JY, Fehlings MG. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology. 1. Vol. 18. WB Saunders; 2011. Mar 1, The Cerebral Palsy Demonstration Project: A multidimensional research approach to cerebral palsy; pp. 31–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Günel MK, Türker D, Ozal C, Kara OK. Physical management of children with cerebral palsy. Cerebral Palsy: Challenges for the Future. 2014 Mar 19;:29. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pomeroy VM, Cooke E, Hamilton S, Whittet A, Tallis RC. Development of a schedule of current physiotherapy treatment used to improve movement control and functional use of the lower limb after stroke: a precursor to a clinical trial. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2005 Dec;19(4):350–359. doi: 10.1177/1545968305280581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosenbloom L. Diagnosis and management of cerebral palsy. Archives of disease in childhood. 1995 Apr;72(4):350. doi: 10.1136/adc.72.4.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mbada CE, Nonvignon J, Ajayi O, Dada OO, Awotidebe TO, Johnson OE, Olarinde A. Impact of missed appointments for out-patient physiotherapy on cost, efficiency, and patients' recovery. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal. 2013 Jun 1;31(1):30–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Medina-Mirapeix F, Lillo-Navarro C, Montilla-Herrador J, Gacto-Sanchez M, Franco-Sierra MA, Escolar-Reina P. Predictors of parents' adherence to home exercise programs for children with developmental disabilities, regarding both exercise frequency and duration: A survey design. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017 Aug 1;53(4):545–555. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04464-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jin J, Sklar GE, Oh VM, Li SC. Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient's perspective. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2008 Feb 4(1):269. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kolt GS, Brewer BW, Pizzari T, Schoo AM, Garrett N. The Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale: a reliable scale for use in clinical physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2007 Mar 1;93(1):17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cummings KM, Frisof KB, Demers P, Walsh D. An appointment reminder system's effect on reducing the number of hypertension patients who drop out from care. American journal of preventive medicine. 1985 Sep 1;1(5):54–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kelloway JS, Wyatt RA, Adlis SA. Comparison of patients' compliance with prescribed oral and inhaled asthma medications. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1994 Jun 27;154(12):1349–1352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Okuno J, Yanagi H, Tomura S, Oka M, Hara S, Hirano C, Tsuchiya S. Compliance and medication knowledge among elderly Japanese home-care recipients. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 1999 Apr 1;55(2):145–149. doi: 10.1007/s002280050609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dassah E, Aldersey H, McColl MA, Davison C. Factors affecting access to primary health care services for persons with disabilities in rural areas: a “best-fit” framework synthesis. Global health research and policy. 2018 Dec 1;3(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0091-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access. Journal of community health. 2013 Oct 1;38(5):976–993. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ownby RL, Hertzog C, Crocco E, Duara R. Factors related to medication adherence in memory disorder clinic patients. Aging and mental health. 2006 Jul 1;10(4):378–385. doi: 10.1080/13607860500410011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mishra SI, Gioia D, Childress S, Barnet B, Webster RL. Adherence to medication regimens among low-income patients with multiple comorbid chronic conditions. Health & social work. 2011 Nov 1;36(4):249–258. doi: 10.1093/hsw/36.4.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Swett C, Jr, Noones J. Factors associated with premature termination from outpatient treatment. Psychiatric Services. 1989 Sep;40(9):947–951. doi: 10.1176/ps.40.9.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kaplan RC, Bhalodkar NC, Brown EJ, Jr, White J, Brown DL. Race, ethnicity, and sociocultural characteristics predict noncompliance with lipid-lowering medications. Preventive Medicine. 2004 Dec 1;39(6):1249–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Choi-Kwon S, Kwon SU, Kim JS. Compliance with risk factor modification: early-onset versus late-onset stroke patients. European neurology. 2005;54(4):204–211. doi: 10.1159/000090710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MH, Field L, Francis CK. Correlates of nonadherence to hypertension treatment in an inner-city minority population. American journal of public health. 1992 Dec;82(12):1607–1612. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.12.1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salt E, Frazier SK. Predictors of medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Drug development research. 2011 Dec;72(8):756–763. doi: 10.1002/ddr.20484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arpey NC, Gaglioti AH, Rosenbaum ME. How socioeconomic status affects patient perceptions of health care: a qualitative study. Journal of primary care & community health. 2017 Jul;8(3):169–175. doi: 10.1177/2150131917697439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Varela C, Young S, Mkandawire N, Groen RS, Banza L, Viste A. Transportation barriers to access health care for surgical conditions in Malawi a cross sectional nationwide household survey. BMC public health. 2019 Dec 1;19(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6577-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Apter AJ, Reisine ST, Affleck G, Barrows E, ZuWallack RL. Adherence with twice-daily dosing of inhaled steroids: socioeconomic and health-belief differences. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1998 Jun 1;157(6):1810–1817. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9712007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bosely CM, Fosbury JA, Cochrane GM. Psychological factors associated with poor compliance with treatment in asthma. EurRespir J. 1995;8:899–904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Carney RM, Freedland KE, Eisen SA, Rich MW, Jaffe AS. Major depression and medication adherence in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. Health Psychology. 1995 Jan;14(1):88. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.1.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gascon JJ, Sánchez-Ortuño M, Llor B, Skidmore D, Saturno PJ. Why hypertensive patients do not comply with the treatment: results from a qualitative study. Family practice. 2004 Apr 1;21(2):125–130. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bender BG, Bender SE. Patient-identified barriers to asthma treatment adherence: responses to interviews, focus groups, and questionnaires. Immunology and Allergy Clinics. 2005 Feb 1;25(1):107–130. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Strömberg A, Broström A, Dahlström U, Fridlund B. Factors influencing patient compliance with therapeutic regimens in chronic heart failure: a critical incident technique analysis. Heart & Lung. 1999 Sep 1;28(5):334–341. doi: 10.1053/hl.1999.v28.a99538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sik Kim Y, Sunwoo S, Ree Lee H, Mi Lee K, Woo Park Y, Cheol Shin H, Hwan Kim C, Hyun Kim D, Sung Kim B, Soo Cha H, Yul Huh B. Determinants of non-compliance with lipid-lowering therapy in hyperlipidemic patients. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2002 Dec;11(7):593–600. doi: 10.1002/pds.730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kiortsis DN, Giral P, Bruckert E, Turpin G. Factors associated with low compliance with lipid-lowering drugs in hyperlipidemic patients. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2000 Dec;25(6):445–451. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2000.00315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Löffler W, Kilian R, Toumi M, Angermeyer MC. Schizophrenic patients' subjective reasons for compliance and noncompliance with neuroleptic treatment. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003 May;36(03):105–112. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gonzalez J, Williams JW, Noël PH, Lee S. Adherence to mental health treatment in a primary care clinic. The journal of the American board of family practice. 2005 Mar 1;18(2):87–96. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.2.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moore PJ, Sickel AE, Malat J, Williams D, Jackson J, Adler NE. Psychosocial factors in medical and psychological treatment avoidance: The role of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of health psychology. 2004 May;9(3):421–433. doi: 10.1177/1359105304042351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lawson VL, Lyne PA, Harvey JN, Bundy CE. Understanding why people with type 1 diabetes do not attend for specialist advice: a qualitative analysis of the views of people with insulin-dependent diabetes who do not attend diabetes clinic. Journal of health psychology. 2005 May;10(3):409–423. doi: 10.1177/1359105305051426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bartlett EE, Grayson M, Barker R, Levine DM, Golden A, Libber S. The effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction; recall, and adherence. Journal of chronic diseases. 1984 Jan 1;37(9–10):755–764. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vlasnik JJ, Aliotta SL, DeLor B. Medication adherence: factors influencing compliance with prescribed medication plans. The Case Manager. 2005 Mar 1;16(2):47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.casemgr.2005.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Butterworth JR, Banfield LM, Iqbal TH, Cooper BT. Factors relating to compliance with a gluten-free diet in patients with coeliac disease: comparison of white Caucasian and South Asian patients. Clinical nutrition. 2004 Oct 1;23(5):1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES