Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Feb 28;18(4):2530–2542. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00714

Table 1:

Key features for the computed free energy profiles shown in Fig. 2 of the main text; energetics (statistical uncertainty in parentheses) are in kcal/mol, and reaction coordinate values (RX: reactant; TS: transition state; PD: product) are in the unit of Angstrom.

Models ξRX ξTS ΔG ΦCH3 ξPD ΔG

M2 −0.88 0.16 10.2(0.2) 46 1.77 −16.3(0.1)
M2+D3 −0.88 0.12 10.5(0.3) 49 1.92 −14.5(0.1)
M3 −0.93 0.20 12.1(0.2) 43 1.90 −12.2(0.1)
M3+D3 −0.88 0.16 11.5(0.2) 48 1.73 −13.2(0.1)
M4 −0.93 0.17 10.4(0.2) 47 1.90 −16.0(0.1)
M4+D3 −0.88 0.21 13.0(0.2) 42 1.68 −11.2(0.1)
M5 −0.92 0.25 11.7(0.2) 44 1.75 −12.5(0.1)
M5+D3 −0.81 0.12 10.1(0.2) 59 1.76 −13.4(0.1)
M5C+D3 −0.92 0.20 12.6(0.2) 42 1.71 −10.7(0.1)
a

The planarity of the methyl group ΦCH3 is given as the average absolute value of the H-C-H-H improper dihedral in degrees from each transition state ensemble with the standard deviation given in parentheses, defined such that 0 is perfectly planar.