Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Feb 28;18(4):2530–2542. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00714

Table 2:

The average number of hydrogen bonds (with standard deviations in parentheses) between atoms in different regions, where cc = core M2/core M2, co = core M2/M5 selection, oo = M5 selection/M5 selection.

Ensemble a QM/MM Model cc co oo

RX M2+D3 0.43 (0.57) 4.50 (1.36) 3.28 (1.32)
M3+D3 0.60 (0.64) 3.98 (1.41) 2.98 (1.32)
M4+D3 0.72 (0.65) 3.92 (1.32) 2.79 (1.26)
M5+D3 0.52 (0.63) 4.25 (1.42) 3.38 (1.24)
TS M2+D3 0.64 (0.66) 3.56 (1.33) 3.16 (1.39)
M3+D3 0.51 (0.62) 4.03 (1.45) 3.56 (1.28)
M4+D3 0.55 (0.63) 3.71 (1.41) 2.64 (1.24)
M5+D3 0.47 (0.60) 4.40 (1.44) 3.21 (1.25)
PD M2+D3 0.55 (0.56) 4.16 (1.33) 3.23 (1.24)
M3+D3 0.43 (0.55) 4.32 (1.45) 3.51 (1.27)
M4+D3 0.46 (0.57) 3.80 (1.43) 2.57 (1.17)
M5+D3 0.52 (0.60) 4.25 (1.40) 3.22 (1.25)
a).

A window size of 0.2 Å was used for the reactant (RX) and product (PD) while a window size of 0.1 Å was used for the transition state (TS).