Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 12;22:835. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05168-y

Table 4.

Time, interaction, and quadratic time effect from the MMRM analyses according to ITT

Time Group Time X group
F (df) F (df) F (df)
TES
 B re-experiencea 8.96(1281.24)** 1.90(1290.20) 0.00(1169.23)
 C avoidance 1.78(1170.79) 0.88(1290.27) 0.10(1170.17)
 D arousal 0.23(1308.42) 0.00(1267.33) 0.32(1173.86)
EPDSb 10.02(1298.65)** 0.05(1267.08) 0.00(1169.23)
SWLS 0.00(1279.80) 4.46(1263.93)* 0.62(1158.96)
WCQ
 Seeking social support 1.88(1314.23) 1.20(1258.62) 0.76(1166.92)
 Confrontive coping 0.34(1179.53) 0.07(1318.17) 0.12(1176.52)
 Self-controlling 5.55(1186.86)** 2.16(1320.22) 0.00(1183.44)
 Escape-avoidance 0.02(1168.88) 2.80(1293.83) 2.34(1167.46)
 Planful problem solving 1.83(1186.61) 1.97(1322.87) 1.56(1183.24)

TES Traumatic event scale, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, WCQ The Ways of coping questionnaire, SWLS The Satisfaction with Life Scale.

a Quadratic Time was a significant predictor F (df) = 5.0*, (1268.20).

b Quadratic Time was a significant predictor F (df) = 6.45* (1273.13).

* p < .05, ** p < .01