Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 12;22:835. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05168-y

Table 6.

Time, interaction, and quadratic time effect from the MMRM analyses according to treatment completers

Time Group Time X group
F (df) F (df) F (df)
TES
 B re-experience a 17.46(1250.05)*** 0.87(1189.26) 0.95(1140.33)
 C avoidance 1.64(1146.30) 4.18(1206.90)* 0.09(1146.18)
 D arousal 0.63(1251.22) 0.07(1192.28) 1.10(1143.41)
EPDS b 11.30(1243.05)** 0.52(1192.62) 0.15(1141.53)
SWLS 1.70(1156.80) 4.63(1273.49)* 0.61(1157.71)
WCQ
 Seeking social support c 3.59(1250.52) 0.09(1182.21) 0.01(1136.70)
 Confrontive coping 0.35(1150,28) 0.18(1230.18) 0.02(1150.71)
 Self-controlling 5.38(1156.98)* 0.46(1227.71) 0.01(1157.45)
 Escape-avoidance 0.02(1141.92) 1.41(1213.28) 3.29(1142.14)
 Planful problem solving 1.84(1161.94) 2.02(1236.67) 2.07(1162.71)

TES Traumatic event scale, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, SWLS The Satisfaction with Life Scale, WCQ The Ways of coping questionnaire.

a Quadratic time was a significant predictor: F (df) = 10.86*** (1227.483).

b Quadratic time was a significant predictor: F (df) = 7.76**, (1225.98).

c Quadratic time was a significant predictor: F (df) = 3.92*, (1227.14).

* p < .05, ** p < .01, ***p < .001