Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 11;23:109. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00847-z

Table 3.

Questionnaire’s answers.

Source: Authors

Question Answer N %
Who defines the members Institution 32 38.1
Members 16 19
Institution + Member + Coordinator 12 14.3
Criteria for defining the members Time availability 16 19
Research experience 13 15.5
Time availability and research experience 25 29.8
Knowledge on the REC/CONEP system 2 2.4
Research experience and bioethics 2 2.4
Hard to get Community representative 41 48.8
Social Sciences and Humanities 13 15.5
Community and Social Sciences and Humanities 12 14.3
Difficulties to participate in the REC Lack of time 29 34.5
Lack of time and institutional incentive 12 14.3
Lack of time and interest 8 9.5
No score on curriculum (associated values) 21 28.8
Adapting the REC’s composition to the standards Easy. The rules are compatible with the institutional and professional reality of the REC 28 33.3
Difficulty to find member for some categories 22 26.2
Difficulty due to lack of interest or possibility to participate in the REC 15 17.9
Meeting the deadlines of CNS OS 001/13 Easy. Deadlines compatible with the REC’s composition and profile 49 58.3
Difficulty to meet deadlines in the analysis of specific areas 14 16.7
Difficult. The deadlines are not compatible with the number of REC members 8 9.5
Composition suitable for accreditation Yes 34 40.5
No 13 15.5
The REC is not interested in the accreditation 15 17.9
The REC is adapting itself for the accreditation process 14 16.7
Suiting the composition to CNS Res 506/16 Easy. The rules are compatible with the institutional and professional reality of the REC 28 33.3
Difficult. The rules are not compatible with the institutional and professional reality of the REC 22 26.2
Difficulty due to the professionals’ lack of interest or possibility of participating in the REC 13 15.5
Operational and financial difficulty 3 3.6
Suitable for reviewing SSH research Yes 64 76.2
No 8 9.5
The REC is still adapting itself to review projects in this field 7 8.3
Suiting the REC’s composition to the CNS Res 510/16 Easy. The rules are compatible with the institutional and professional reality of the members 50 59.5
Operational difficulty. The rules are not compatible with the institutional and professional reality of the members 13 15.5
Difficulty due to the professionals’ lack of interest or possibility of participating in the REC 11 13.1