Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;227(9):2971–2989. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02519-5

Table 1.

Demographical, cognitive and apathy characteristics of bvFTD patients and HC

bvFTD HC bvFTD vs HC
% Women 35% 62.5% χ2= 1.71; P = 0.19
Age 65.8 (8.8) 62.9 (7.6) T = 1.07; P = 0.29
Years since 1st symptoms 4.4 (2.3)
Education level 6.4 (2.0) 7.3 (1.1) W = 111; P = 0.34
MMSE (/30) 24.1 (2.8) 29.4 (0.8) W = 8; P < 0.001
DRS (/144) 119.5 (9.3) 142.3 (1.3) W = 0; P < 0.001
FAB (/18) 12.5 (3.4) 17.3 (0.9) W = 6; P < 0.001
SAS (/42) 15.4 (4.8) 6.3 (2.8) T = 7.13; P < 0.001
DAS (/72) 30.4 (10.5) 19.6 (8.6) T = 3.40; P < 0.01
DAS-Emotional (/24) 10.9 (3.9) 8.3 (3.4) T = 2.15; P < 0.05
DAS-Initiation (/24) 9.9 (5.9) 7.0 (4.0) T = 1.73; P = 0.09
DAS-Executive (/24) 9.7 (5.0) 4.3 (3.7) W = 256; P < 0.01

Data are given as Mean (SD). BvFTD: N = 20/Controls: N = 16

MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; DRS, Dementia Rating Scale; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; SAS, Starkstein Apathy Scale; DAS, Dimensional Apathy Scale; n.s., non-significant