Figure 5.

(A) DiFuMo-256 components that are more likely to coactivate with one FPCN sub-network than the other. In blue, we depict regions exhibiting a greater probability of coactivation with FPCN-A. In red, we depict regions exhibiting a greater probability of coactivation with FPCN-B. The absolute difference between region coactivation probabilities is defined as $\mathrm{\Delta }=\mathbf{P}[\text{RegionReported}(r)|\text{NetworkReported}(\mathtt{FPCN}-\mathtt{A})]-\mathbf{P}[\text{RegionReported}(r)|\text{NetworkReported}(\mathtt{FPCN}-\mathtt{B})]$. A likelihood-ratio test and an FDR correction ($\alpha =0.05$) for multiple comparisons are used to identify regions that exhibit significant coactivation with either network before estimating $\mathrm{\Delta }$. (B) The default mode network (DMN) and the dorsal attention network (DAN) from the 7-Network atlas of Yeo et al. 2011. DMN regions are more likely to coactivate with FPCN-A, whereas DAN regions are more likely to coactivate with FPCN-B.