Table 3.
Salivary and periodontal parameters according to salivary flow rate.
Hyposalivation (flow rate less than 0.1 mL/min) N = 25 | Reduced salivation (flow rate 0.1–0.3 mL/min) N = 97 | Normal salvation (flow rate more than 0.3 mL/min) N = 66 | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 61 (53–70) | 60 (52–68) | 58.5 (49–66.75) | 0.487 |
Sex | ||||
Male | 14 (56%) | 69 (71.1%) | 52 (78.8%) | 0.095 |
Female | 11 (44%) | 28 (28.9%) | 14 (21.2%) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 31.6 (27.1–36.8) | 29.7 (26.2–32.9) | 30.1 (27.82–32.92) | 0.283 |
AHI (events/h) | 26.8 (10.9–46.8) | 20.1 (11–34.9) | 19.5 (10.52–36.5) | 0.672 |
Salivary parameters | ||||
Salivary pH | 6.36 (6.06–6.78) 3 | 6.53 (6.3–6.76) 3 | 6.89 (6.62–7.16) 1,2 | < 0.001 |
Salivary calcium (mmol/L) | 0.67 (0.47–0.94) 3 | 0.56 (0.41–0.71) 3 | 0.42 (0.34–0.57) 1,2 | < 0.001 |
Salivary phosphate (mmol/L) | 8.38 (4.91–11.27) 3 | 6.93 (5.48–8.77) 3 | 5.35 (4.46–6.43) 1,2 | < 0.001 |
Salivary magnesium (mmol/L) | 0.42 (0.34–0.6) 2,3 | 0.2 (0.16–0.25) 1,3 | 0.15 (0.1–0.19) 1,2 | < 0.001 |
Ca/Mg | 1.8 (1.35–2.48) 2,3 | 2.65 (1.92–3.78) 1 | 3 (2.15–4.67) 1 | < 0.001 |
Ca/PO4 | 0.09 (0.06–0.12) | 0.09 (0.06–0.12) | 0.09 (0.06–0.12) | 0.842 |
Mg/PO4 | 0.05 (0.03–0.06) 2,3 | 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 1 | 0.03 (0.02–0.03) 1 | < 0.001 |
Salivary cortisol (ng/mL) | 5.44 (4.59–6.58) 3 | 5.02 (3.59–6.13) 3 | 3.88 (1.7–5.56) 1,2 | 0.003 |
N = 17 | N = 75 | N = 50 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Periodontal status | ||||
Number of teeth | 20 (16–24) | 21 (16–27) | 24 (18–27) | 0.269 |
Plaque (%) | 59 (52–100) | 63 (49.5–80.5) | 67 (53.5–80.5) | 0.894 |
BoP (%) | 27 (14–29) | 22 (12.5–37) | 17 (7.5–28.5) | 0.234 |
CAL (mm) | 2.5 (2.3–3) | 2.7 (2.3–3) | 2.6 (1.95–3.05) | 0.573 |
PISA score (mm2) | 240.2 (111.1–349.8) | 238.29 (94.22–373.1) | 147.6 (74.6–331.4) | 0.245 |
Data are presented as the medians with interquartile ranges. The Kruskal‒Wallis test was used for group comparisons.
1Post hoc difference significant to < 0.1 per group following the Mann‒Whitney U test.
2Post hoc difference significant to 0.1–0.3 per group following Mann‒Whitney U test.
3Post hoc difference significant to > 0.3 per group following Mann‒Whitney U test.