Table 2.
No. | Compounds | EEt | EI | ED |
---|---|---|---|---|
g of Compound/100 g of Extract 1 | ||||
1 | DIBOA | 4.77 ± 0.11 | 2.18 ± 0.04 | <LOQ |
2 | HBOA | 0.78 ± 0.10 | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.04 |
5 | β-OH-verbascoside | <LOD | <LOQ | <LOQ |
6 | β-OH-verbascoside | <LOD | 0.42 ± 0.05 | <LOQ |
8 | Verbascoside | 1.02 ± 0.13 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.05 |
9 | Luteolin di-glucuronide | --- | <LOQ | <LOQ |
10 | β-EtOH-verbascoside isomer | <LOQ | --- | --- |
11 | β-EtOH-verbascoside isomer | <LOQ | --- | --- |
12 | Hispidulin di-glucuronide | --- | --- | <LOQ |
13 | Verbascoside isomer | <LOD | <LOQ | <LOQ |
14 | Hispidulin glucuronide | <LOQ | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
1 Values are the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates; LOD (limit of detection); LOQ (limit of quantification); EEt—ethanol extract; EI—infusion; ED—decoction.