Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 29;19(21):14157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114157

Table 2.

Inter- and intragroup comparative analysis of electric field strength, magnetic field strength and power density among the study group at different distances.

SG EF p Value MF p Value PD p Value
50 m 100 m 50 m 100 m 50 m 100 m
I 588.88 ± 426.87 525.79 ± 458.00 0.690 1590.90 ± 1116.30 1345.17 ± 1166.39 0.547 0.07 ± 0.09 0.10 ± 0.11 0.519
II 962.65 ± 1528.52 657.68 ± 515.25 0.455 1545.02 ± 1083.03 1784.84 ± 1406.43 0.593 0.09 ± 0.08 0.15 ± 0.21 0.283
III 555.19 ± 292.34 661.48 ± 358.62 0.365 1440.84 ± 832.57 2085.10 ± 1157.29 0.081 0.06 ± 0.06 0.10 ± 0.08 0.168
IV 1448.51 ± 2566.34 574.34 ± 316.66 0.186 2221.28 ± 884.85 1616.91 ± 745.03 0.045 * 0.12 ± 0.09 0.07 ± 0.06 0.049 *
p value 0.315 0.754 0.116 0.327 0.190 0.362

Note: One-Way ANOVA; Unpaired t Test; * p < 0.05; SG—Study Groups; EF—Electric field strength measured in mV/m; MF—Magnetic field strength measured in μA/m; PD—Power density measured in μW/cm2; Results are expressed in mean ± standard deviation.