Skip to main content
Plants logoLink to Plants
. 2022 Nov 3;11(21):2972. doi: 10.3390/plants11212972

Essential Oil and Non-Volatile Metabolites from Kaunia longipetiolata (Sch.Bip. ex Rusby) R. M. King and H. Rob., an Andean Plant Native to Southern Ecuador

Omar Malagón 1, Cinthia Bravo 1, Giovanni Vidari 2,3, Nixon Cumbicus 4, Gianluca Gilardoni 1,*
Editors: Jésus Palá-Pául, Joe Brophy, Daniela Rigano
PMCID: PMC9654423  PMID: 36365423

Abstract

Kaunia longipetiolata (Sch.Bip. ex Rusby) R. M. King and H. Rob. (Asteraceae) is a plant native to southern Ecuador. The dry leaves afforded, by steam distillation, an essential oil that was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by GC-MS and GC-FID, respectively, on two orthogonal columns of different polarity. Sesquiterpenes predominated in the volatile fraction, among which α-zingiberene (19.7–19.1%), ar-curcumene (17.3–18.1%), caryophyllene oxide (5.1–5.3%), (Z)-β-caryophyllene (3.0–3.1%), (2Z,6Z)-farnesal (2.6–3.6%), and spathulenol (2.0–2.1%) were the major components. In addition to the identified compounds, two main unidentified constituents (possibly oxygenated sesquiterpenes) with probable molecular masses of 292 and 230, respectively, were detected. They constituted about 5% and 8% (w/w), respectively, of the whole essential oil. The oil chemical composition was complemented with the enantioselective analysis of ten chiral components. Four scalemic mixtures and six enantiomerically pure terpenes were identified. An enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined for (1R,5R)-(+)-β-pinene (65.0%), (R)-(−)-α-phellandrene (94.6%), (S)-(+)-linalool (15.0%), and (R)-(−)-terpinen-4-ol (33.8%). On the other hand, (1R,5R)-(+)-α-pinene, (1R,5R)-(+)-sabinene, (S)-(−)-limonene, (S)-(+)-β-phellandrene, (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(−)-α-copaene, and (R)-(+)-germacrene D were enantiomerically pure. Finally, the non-volatile fraction obtained by extraction of the leaves with MeOH was investigated. Eight known compounds were isolated by liquid column chromatographic separations. Their structures were determined by NMR spectroscopy as dehydroleucodine, kauniolide, (3S,3aR,4aR,6aS,9aS,9bR)-3-hydroxy-1,4a-dimethyl-7-methylene-5,6,6a,7,9a,9b-hexahydro-3H-oxireno[2′,3′:8,8a]azuleno[4,5-b]furan-8(4aH)-one, novanin, bisabola-1,10-diene-3,4-trans-diol, (R)-2-(2-(acetoxymethyl)oxiran-2-yl)-5-methylphenyl isobutyrate, eupalitin-3-O-glucoside, and 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid. Literature data about the identified metabolites indicate that K. longipetiolata is a rich source of biologically active natural products.

Keywords: Ageratina longipetiolata, Eupatorium longipetiolatum, Eupatorium uber, Kaunia arbuscularis, Kaunia uber, Asteraceae, essential oil, enantioselective analysis, guaianolides, dehydroleucodine

1. Introduction

Medicinal plants can historically be considered the first source of effective drugs, whose knowledge is an important heritage of many traditional cultures worldwide. The biological properties of vegetal drugs are mainly attributed to the presence of specialized metabolites, whose structural and biological relationships with human endogenous biomolecules can explain their pharmacological activities. However, pharmacology is not the only interesting application of natural products, since several specialized metabolites are components of volatile fractions, which are typically responsible for the scent of aromatic plants. Upon submission to steam distillation, aromatic species afford an organic phase called essential oil (EO) that usually spontaneously separates from water. Most of these volatile oils are important commercial products, widely used by pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food, and household detergency industries.

Currently, most of the European and North American flora has been phytochemically investigated and the search for new natural products is focused on the plants of tropical countries. In these regions, the existence of a rich biodiversity together with a historically scarce scientific investigation make the discovery of new natural products quite promising [1,2]. In particular, the so-called “megadiverse” countries are invaluable sources of phytochemically unprecedented botanical species. In fact, according to the UN Environment Programme, these countries are characterized by possessing two-thirds of all non-fish vertebrate and three-fourths of all higher plant species of the world [3]. Due to the rich and unique biodiversity, Ecuador is included among the megadiverse countries. For this reason, our group has been investigating for many years the phytochemistry of the Ecuadorian flora, which is largely unexplored. Our aims are to discover new biologically active natural products and to contribute to the advancements of scientific knowledge concerning the neotropical flora [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. More recently, we focused especially on the study of EOs, since they can be interesting sources of sesquiterpenoids, bioactive and flavoring products, as well as novel mixtures of enantiomers with different enantiomeric excesses [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].

In this context, Kaunia longipetiolata (Sch.Bip. ex Rusby) R. M. King and H. Rob. (Figure 1) was selected as a promising plant for the study of its EO. In fact, this species belongs to the family Asteraceae, which is well known for the abundance of EO-bearing taxa. Despite the wide distribution of the plant, no study has been reported about an EO from K. longipetiolata. Furthermore, the phytochemistry of the entire genus Kaunia is very little described in literature. The structures of non-volatile constituents from the aerial parts of K. arbuscularis (B. L. Robins) R. M. King and H. Rob., K. ignorata (Hieron.) R. M. King and H. Rob., K. saltensis (Hieron.) R. M. King and H. Rob., and K. lasiophthalma (Griseb.) R. M. King and H. Rob., including several sesquiterpene guaianolides, have been reported in a few studies [18,19,20]. However, no biological activity or traditional medicinal use is described in literature for K. longipetiolata.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaunia longipetiolata (Sch.Bip. ex Rusby) R. M. King and H. Rob. Photo by Cinthia Bravo.

In the present work, the chemical and enantiomeric composition of the EO from leaves of K. longipetiolata are described for the first time. The major components of the EO were α−zingiberene, ar-curcumene, caryophyllene oxide, (Z)-β-caryophyllene, (2Z,6Z)-farnesal, and spathulenol. This study was completed with the investigation of a non-volatile fraction, extracted from another lot of leaves of K. longipetiolata. Three known guaianolides (1315), including high amounts of dehydroleucodine, together with five other known compounds (1620), were isolated.

From the botanical point of view, Kaunia R. M. King and H. Rob. (Asteraceae, Eupatorieae) is a small genus of about ten species, comprising shrubs or small trees that play an important role in the Andean ecosystems, from Ecuador to northwestern Argentina and, exceptionally, Brazil and Paraguay [21,22]. They are mostly distributed in different environments of subtropical forests, especially in shrubby layers or secondary forests [22,23]. The native distribution of K. longipetiolata ranges from Bolivia to southern Ecuador, where it occurs in different bioclimatic zones such as sub-humid, pluviseasonal, and mesotropical to dry and xeric, at an altitude ranging from 1000 to 4000 m above sea level [22,23]. The plant is a very common tree in the province of Loja (Ecuador), where it is used for tracing borders between rural properties [21]. It is interesting to note that K. longipetiolata (Rusby) R. M. King and H. Rob. and K. arbuscularis (B. L. Rob.) R. M. King and H. Rob. are considered two separate accepted species in the list of vascular plants appearing in the World Flora Online, while they have been considered heterotypic synonyms in a recent revision of the genus Kaunia [22,24]. K. longipetiolata is also known by the synonyms of Ageratina longipetiolata (Rusby) R. M. King and H. Rob., Eupatorium longepetiolatum Sch. Bip., Eupatorium longipetiolatum Rusby, Eupatorium longipetiolatum var. longipetiolatum, Eupatorium uber B. L. Rob., and Kaunia uber (B. L. Rob.) R. M. King and H. Rob. [24].

2. Results

2.1. EO from Leaves of K. longipetiolata

2.1.1. Chemical Analysis

The EO was distilled from the leaves of K. longipetiolata, with an average yield of 0.13 ± 0.05% (w/w), calculated over four analytical repetitions. The volatile fraction was composed mainly of sesquiterpenes, corresponding to 81.9% and 84.8% of the whole EO, analyzed by GC-FID on a non-polar and polar column, respectively. To the entire sesquiterpene fraction, hydrocarbons contributed for 44.3% and 44.8% (w/w), respectively, whereas oxygenated derivatives were 37.6% and 40.0% (w/w). A total of 72 GC peaks were detected, of which 69 corresponded to individual oil components identified on at least one column. Instead, two likely oxygenated sesquiterpenoids, together accounting for 14.2% and 12.1% (w/w), were unidentified, whereas a third GC peak corresponded to a mixture of three unseparated unidentified compounds. The two main unknown compounds, with probable molecular weights of 292 and 230 (Table 1), respectively, were separated as a mixture from the whole EO (obtained by a preparative distillation). However, they were inseparable from each other by both normal-phase and reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

The major identified compounds were α-zingiberene (1) (19.7–19.1% of the EO, w/w), ar-curcumene (2) (17.3–18.1%), caryophyllene oxide (3) (5.3–5.1%), (Z)-β-caryophyllene (4) (3.0–3.1%), (2Z,6Z)-farnesal (5) (2.6–3.6%), and spathulenol (6) (2.0–2.1%). Their chemical structures with the corresponding numbers in bold are depicted in Figure 2. All the quantified constituents accounted for 87.5% and 92.5% of the whole EO, calculated as the sum of the integrated peaks with respect to total area of the gas chromatogram. A relative response factor was calculated for each oil component (see Section 4.4.1) and the resulting corrected chromatographic areas were interpolated using a calibration curve. The qualitative and quantitative composition of the EO from K. longipetiolata is reported in Table 1, whereas the mass spectra of the two main unidentified compounds and the GC-MS chromatograms on the two columns are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Major identified compounds in the EO of K. longipetiolata.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Electronic impact mass spectra of the unidentified compounds corresponding to peaks 67 (left) and 69 (right).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GC-MS chromatogram of K. longipetiolata EO on a 5%-phenyl-methylpolysiloxane stationary phase column. The peaks are numbered according to the order of oil components listed in Table 1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

GC-MS chromatogram of K. longipetiolata EO on a polyethylene glycol stationary phase column. The peaks are numbered according to the order of oil components listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Chemical analysis of Kaunia longipetiolata essential oil on 5%-phenyl-methylpolysiloxane and polyethylene glycol GC columns. The progressive numbers are referred to peaks in Figure 4 and Figure 5.

N. Compounds 5%-Phenyl-Methylpolysiloxane Polyethylene Glycol
LRI a LRI b % σ LRI c LRI Reference % σ
1 α-pinene 925 932 0.3 0.01 1018 1025 [25] 1.1 0.99
2 sabinene 963 969 Trace - 1119 1122 [25] Trace -
3 β-pinene 968 974 Trace - 1108 1110 [25] 0.1 0.01
4 dehydro-1.8-cineole 986 988 0.2 0.10 1188 1187 [26] 0.1 0.01
5 δ-2-carene 995 1001 0.2 0.07 1128 1133 [25] 0.2 0.01
6 α-phellandrene 1003 1002 0.2 0.01 1162 1167 [25] 0.2 0.14
7 p-cymene 1020 1020 0.3 0.15 1270 1270 [25] 0.3 0.20
8 limonene 1024 1024 Trace - 1198 1198 [25] Trace -
9 β-phellandrene 1043 1025 Trace - 1207 1209 [25] Trace -
10 (E)-β-ocimene 1052 1044 Trace - 1253 1250 [25] Trace -
11 terpinolene 1080 1086 Trace - 1281 1282 [25] 0.1 0.01
12 α-gurjunene - - - - 1519 1529 [25] Trace -
13 linalool 1104 1095 0.1 0.01 1553 1543 [25] 0.2 0.06
14 terpinen-4-ol 1177 1174 0.2 0.06 1601 1601 [25] Trace -
15 coahuilensol, methyl ether 1218 1219 0.4 0.18 1674 - - 0.1 0.05
16 thymol, methyl ether 1228 1232 Trace - 1596 1587 [25] 0.2 0.01
17 carvacrol, methyl ether 1236 1241 Trace - 1607 1599 [25] 0.1 0.01
18 thymol 1292 1289 0.4 0.13 2179 2164 [25] 1.6 0.48
19 carvacrol 1300 1298 0.7 0.30 2195 2210 [25] 1.2 0.46
20 α-copaene 1363 1374 Trace - 1482 1491 [25] Trace -
21 2-epi-α-funebrene 1380 1380 0.2 0.08 1533 - - 0.2 0.08
22 sesquithujene 1396 1405 Trace - 1563 1560 [27] 0.2 0.06
23 (Z)-β-caryophyllene (4) 1405 1408 3.0 0.55 1585 1588 [25] 3.1 0.26
24 α-trans-bergamotene 1425 1432 0.2 0.10 1579 1575 [25] 0.2 0.08
25 alloaromadendrene 1433 1432 d Trace - 1651 1649 [25] 0.1 0.01
26 α-humulene 1440 1452 0.9 0.26 1658 1667 [25] 0.9 0.28
27 (E)-β-farnesene 1452 1454 0.2 0.12 1669 1664 [25] 0.2 0.10
28 germacrene D 1466 1481 0.9 0.57 1698 1708 [25] 1.4 0.36
29 γ-curcumene 1471 1481 0.3 0.13 1687 1692 [25] 0.3 0.17
30 α-selinene - - - - 1710 1725 [25] 0.1 0.01
31 ar-curcumene (2) 1477 1479 17.3 5.31 1772 1773 [25] 18.1 4.95
32 10-epi-β-acoradiene 1481 1474 0.4 0.08 1722 - - 0.2 0.05
33 α-zingiberene (1) 1491 1493 19.7 11.36 1718 1721 [25] 19.1 7.68
34 sesquicineole 1505 1515 0.5 0.19 1736 1733 [28] 0.7 0.29
35 δ-cadinene 1507 1522 0.4 0.11 1750 1756 [25] 0.4 0.18
36 β-curcumene 1510 1514 0.2 0.05 1724 1737 [25] Trace -
37 β-sesquiphellandrene 1516 1521 0.3 0.17 1764 1771 [25] 0.3 0.15
38 γ-cuprenene 1538 1532 0.3 0.14 - - - - -
39 cis-sesquisabinene hydrate 1549 1542 0.2 0.08 2112 2110 [29] 1.5 0.38
40 (E)-nerolidol 1560 1561 1.0 0.21 2048 2036 [25] 1.2 0.40
41 Spathulenol (6) 1564 1577 2.0 0.99 2117 2127 [25] 2.1 1.03
42 (E)-β-ionone - - - - 1934 1936 [25] 0.3 0.15
43 caryophyllene oxide (3) 1566 1558 5.3 2.55 1969 1966 [30] 5.1 2.34
44 ar-turmerol 1574 1582 0.5 0.15 2212 2214 [31] 0.6 0.24
45 salvial-4(14)-en-1-one 1578 1594 0.7 0.00 1995 1995 [32] 0.5 0.14
46 humulene epoxide II 1593 1608 1.0 0.51 2025 2026 [29] 1.3 0.65
47 α-acorenol 1616 1632 0.3 0.05 2169 2163 [25] 0.1 0.06
48 isospathulenol - - - - 2224 2230 [25] 0.3 0.06
49 β-atlantol 1619 1608 0.3 0.13 2229 - - 1.0 0.32
50 gossonorol 1632 1636 0.8 0.22 2308 2312 [33] 1.2 0.38
51 epi-α-muurolol 1643 1640 1.0 0.37 2143 2153 [34] 0.2 0.08
52 14-hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene 1659 1668 0.4 0.07 1962 - - 0.6 0.44
53 epi-β-bisabolol 1662 1670 0.6 0.25 2149 2150 [35] 0.7 0.19
54 khusinol 1671 1679 0.4 0.16 2290 - - 0.8 0.44
55 eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1β-ol 1676 1687 0.8 0.31 2357 2371 [25] 1.0 1.00
56 epi-α-bisabolol 1677 1683 0.2 0.10 2217 2214 [25] 0.4 0.08
57 α-bisabolol 1680 1685 1.1 0.50 2220 2213 [25] 0.2 0.05
58 (2Z,6Z)-farnesal (5) 1686 1684 2.6 0.44 2270 - - 3.6 2.03
59 γ- costol - - - - 2516 - - 0.3 0.13
60 curcuphenol 1716 1717 0.7 0.29 2617 - - 0.8 0.49
61 cryptomerione 1730 1724 0.3 0.15 2480 - - 0.6 0.23
62 (6R,7R)-bisabolone 1737 1740 0.4 0.22 2297 - - 0.2 0.09
63 xanthorrhizol 1748 1751 1.2 0.36 2678 2674 [32] 1.5 0.30
64 β-costol 1756 1765 0.5 0.22 2578 - - 0.5 0.25
65 α-costol 1761 1773 0.4 0.17 2574 - - 0.4 0.18
66 (Z)-nuciferol acetate 1821 1830 0.2 0.07 2337 - - 1.1 0.45
67 Unidentified (MW 232) 1882 - 5.2 1.30 2714 - - 4.8 0.99
68 Unidentified (mixture) 1897 - 0.6 0.38 2794 - - 0.5 0.18
69 Unidentified (MW 230) 1925 - 9.0 4.51 2831 - - 7.3 1.84
70 palmitic acid 1972 1971 e 2.3 2.15 2844 - - - -
71 phytol 2111 2103 f 0.3 0.10 2597 2603 [36] 0.8 0.46
72 sempervirol 2285 2282 Trace - - - - Trace -
Monoterpene hydrocarbons 1.0 2.0
Oxygenated monoterpenes 1.9 3.5
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 44.3 44.8
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes 37.6 40.0
Others 2.7 2.2
Total identified 87.5 92.5

a Calculated linear retention indices on DB5-MS capillary column; b linear retention indices according to literature [37]. c Calculated linear retention indices on HP-INNOWax capillary column; d [38], e [39], f [40]. Traces ≤ 0.1%. MW = molecular weight.

2.1.2. Enantioselective GC Analysis

The enantioselective GC analysis of K. longipetiolata EO indicated ten chiral components, of which six were enantiomerically pure, whereas four occurred as scalemic mixtures (7/8, 9/10, and 11/12, see Figure 6). The enantiomeric distribution and the enantiomeric excess (ee) of these chiral terpenoids are shown in Table 2.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Enantiomeric pairs detected by GC enantioselective analysis: (1R,5R)-(+)-β-pinene (7), (1S,5S)-(–)-β-pinene (8), (R)-(−)-α-phellandrene (9), (S)-(+)-α-phellandrene (10), (S)-(+)-terpinen-4-ol (11), and (R)-(−)-terpinen-4-ol (12).

Table 2.

Enantioselective analysis of K. longipetiolata EO on a 2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin-based GC column.

LRIs Enantiomers Enantiomeric Distribution (%) ee (%)
932 (1R,5R)-(+)-α-pinene 100 100
960 (1R,5R)-(+)-β-pinene (7) 82.5 65.0
969 (1S,5S)-(−)-β-pinene (8) 17.5
989 (1R,5R)-(+)-sabinene 100 100
1029 (R)-(−)-α-phellandrene (9) 97.3 94.6
1036 (S)-(+)-α-phellandrene (10) 2.7
1064 (S)-(−)-limonene 100 100
1070 (S)-(+)-β-phellandrene 100 100
1199 (R)-(−)-linalool 42.5 15.0
1209 (S)-(+)-linalool 57.5
1270 (S)-(+)-terpinen-4-ol (11) 33.1 33.8
1272 (R)-(−)-terpinen-4-ol (12) 66.9
1332 (1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(−)-α-copaene 100 100
1473 (R)-(+)-germacrene D 100 100

2.2. Non-Volatile Metabolites from Leaves of K. longipetiolata

The methanol extract of K. longipetiolata dry leaves, after solvent partition and preparative liquid chromatography, afforded eight specialized compounds, whose numbered chemical structures are depicted in Figure 7. Depending on their structure and biogenesis, three of them belonged to the family of guaianolide sesquiterpenoids (13–15), whereas the others included a germacranolide sesquiterpene (16), a bisabolene derivative (17), a monoterpenoid thymol derivative (18), a glucosyl flavonol (19), and a shikimic acid derivative dicaffeoyl ester (20). The isolation of these compounds is already described in the literature: dehydroleucodine (13) from K. arbuscularis [18], K. ignorata [18], and K. lasiophthalma [20]; kauniolide (14) from K. arbuscularis [18]; the lactone 15 from K. lasiophthalma [20]; novanin (16) from K. arbuscularis [19], a few Artemisia species [41,42,43], and from Argyranthemum adauctum [44]; bisabola-1,10-dien-3,4-trans-diol (=3,4-trans-dihydroxybisabola-1,10-diene) (17) from Alpinia densibracteata [45]; the diester 18 from K. ignorata [18]; and the rare flavonoid eupalitin-3-O-glucoside (19) from Sesuvium portulacastrum [46]. Finally, 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (20) is a common natural product, occurring in several widespread plants, such as Pyrus communis and Ipomoea batatas [47,48]. The structures of compounds 13–20 were determined from NMR data which were compared with those reported in the literature. Furthermore, the X-ray diffraction analysis of easily crystallizable dehydroleucodine (13) afforded the ORTEP structure shown in Figure 8.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Non-volatile secondary metabolites isolated from the leaves of K. longipetiolata and identified by NMR spectroscopy. The numbers are referred to in Section 1, Section 2 and Section 3.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Computer-generated Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) of dehydroleucodine (13) from X-ray diffraction analysis.

3. Discussion

The EO from leaves of K. longipetiolata contained an abundant sesquiterpene fraction, where two compounds, α-zingiberene (1) and ar-curcumene (2) (Figure 2), accounted for about 37% (w/w) of the whole oil mass. Due to their biogenesis, the compounds 1 and 2 are usually found together in the EOs of several plants, where they are typically major components. This is the case of the Zingiber species [49,50,51], whose EOs are endowed with antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities [52,53]. Interestingly, the amounts of compounds 1 and 2 in the EO distilled from the rhizomes of Z. officinale were comparable to those determined in the EO of K. longipetiolata [49]. Isolated α-zingiberene exhibited moderate cytotoxic activity against HeLa, U-87, Siha, and HL60 cell lines, and apoptotic effects the in the cervix cancer cell SiHa [54,55]. Moreover, α-zingiberene (1) showed high anti-rhinoviral activity in vitro [56] and therapeutic potential in the treatment of pathologies in which processes such as inflammation and angiogenesis are exacerbated, and even for the treatment of chronic wounds [57]. On the other hand, ar-curcumene (2) was identified as one of the main compounds responsible for the antitumor effects of Curcuma zanthorrhiza [58], and as an antiulcer [59] and anti-inflammatory agent of ginger [60]. In fact, it reduced the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced secretion of the proinflammatory chemokine interleukin 8 (IL-8) in human bronchial epithelial cells [61]. Compound 2 also showed high larvicidal and oviposition deterrence activity against malaria, dengue, Zika, filariasis, and St. Louis encephalitis mosquito vectors [60].

Regarding the non-volatile metabolites, sesquiterpenoid lactones 1316 are of high biological interest. In fact, sesquiterpenoids incorporating a cyclic enone and/or α,β-unsaturated lactone moieties can react readily as electrophiles with nucleophilic sites of biomacromolecules [62,63]. As a result, they exhibit a wide range of biological activities such as anti-inflammatory, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antiproliferative effects [64]. Guaianolides are mainly occurring in the Asteraceae and Apiaceae families. Dehydroleucodine (13) (synonyms: 11,13-dehydroleucodin, dehydroleucodin, leucodin, lidbeckialactone, mesatlantin E), isolated from Kaunia [18,19,20], Artemisia [42,65], and Stevia [66] species (Asteraceae), showed gastroduodenal mucosal protection in response to necrosis-inducing agents, inhibition of chemical-induced mast cell degranulation, neuropeptide-induced mast cell activation, and cytotoxicity in mouse melanoma cells and a mouse melanoma model, human astrocytoma, and leukemia cells [65]. Recently, it was demonstrated that dehydroleucodine (13) possessed DNA methyl transferase (DNMT) inhibitory activity, reduced global and gene-specific DNA methylation, and increased expression of tumor suppressor genes MHL1 and PTEN, which can contribute to the induction of apoptosis and cell death. It was concluded that lactone 13 holds the exciting potential as a novel therapeutic agent in ovarian cancer [65]. The cytotoxicity of dehydroleucodine (13) in vitro and in vivo has also been the subject of intense studies in our laboratories [67,68,69,70,71,72], leading the authors to patent its application for treatment of cancer [73]. It is important to emphasize that, in the present study, dehydroleucodine was obtained in high yields (>3.8% w/w) from K. longipetiolata dry leaves, and it was easily purified by spontaneous crystallization from a chromatographic fraction (see Section 4.4.3). Moreover, K. longipetiolata is widely distributed in southern Ecuador, and it is not protected and is easily cultivable. For all these features, the plant can be considered a new excellent source of the promising drug dehydroleucodine (13).

As concerns the compounds 1420, they have been less studied, and no important biological activity has yet been reported for them. However, due to their rareness, some of them are interesting chemotaxonomically. This is, for instance, the case of compound 15, isolated so far only from K. lasiophthalma [20] and the thymol derivative 18, previously found in K. longipetiolata [18] and Eupatorium glechonophyllum [74].

The results of the GC enantioselective analysis deserve a separate comment. The enantioselective analysis of the EO was carried out using an enantioselective capillary column, based on modified β-cyclodextrines. Cyclodextrines are chiral cyclic polysaccharides, whose internal cavity can host small chiral molecules adding dissymmetric information. For this reason, the host–guest interaction presents a diastereomeric character, allowing two enantiomers to be separated. In the present study, the finding that a few terpenoid components of the EO occurred as scalemic mixtures (Table 2) indicated that the biochemical machinery of K. longipetiolata contained two separate enzyme systems, each capable of elaborating a single enantiomer [75]. Thus, the formation of the separate enantiomers of linalyl pyrophosphate (LPP), (R)-21 and (S)-22, from geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) (23), followed by analogous carbocation reactions, would explain the production of the couples of monoterpene enantiomers 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12, as shown in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Proposed biosynthetic pathways of the couples of enantiomers 7/8, 9/10, and 11/12.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

The leaves of K. longipetiolata were collected on two different dates from plants growing in the same location: in March 2003 for the study of the non-volatile fraction, and in June 2018 for the investigation of the EO. The time gap between the two botanical collections is because the investigation of non-volatile metabolites was carried out in Italy in 2005, while the analysis of the EO was conducted in Ecuador in 2018. For the sake of completeness, the results of the two studies are reported together in this paper. The collection site corresponded to an area of about 0.5 km2, around a central point of coordinates 3°51′44.1′′ S and 79°11′46.8′′ W, in the province of Loja (southern Ecuador). Vouchers are deposited at the herbarium of the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), with accession code HUTPL 1345. This investigation was carried out under the permission of the Ministry of Environment, Water and Ecological Transition of Ecuador, with MAATE registry number MAE-DNB-CM-2016-0048. The botanical species was identified by one of the authors (N.C.). The leaves were dried at 35° for 48 h and stored in a dark and fresh place until use.

4.2. Distillation of the EO

The essential oil used for the qualitative and quantitative analyses was obtained by analytical steam distillation of dry leaves (100 g) in a Marcusson-type apparatus for 4 h. The process was repeated four times. To collect the oil, a solution (2.0 mL) containing n-nonane as the internal standard (6.8 mg) in cyclohexane (10 mL) was introduced in the collection tube, above the aqueous phase. The resulting cyclohexane solution was directly injected in the GC instrument. Additionally, for the attempted separation of the unidentified components, the EO was steam-distilled for 4 h in a stainless-steel Clevenger-type apparatus, obtaining 1.4 g of a pure essential oil from 1.1 Kg of dry plant material. The yield and chemical composition of the pure EO were the same as those obtained by the analytical process.

4.3. Extract Preparation

Dry leaves (1.2 Kg) of K. longipetiolata were submitted to exhaustive solvent extraction with methanol (MeOH, 7.5 L) by repeated maceration at room temperature. Subsequently, the solvent was removed by under vacuum distillation. The total extract (12.2 g) was partitioned between hexane (Hex) and acetonitrile (MeCN), producing two immiscible phases and a residue (R, 6.5 g). The evaporated polar phase (4.5 g) was submitted to solid-phase extraction (SPE) to remove residual chlorophylls and other non-polar compounds. In this process, the acetonitrile fraction was eluted with 85% aqueous methanol through a 45 g reversed-phase column, affording 3.2 g of a chlorophyll-free polar extract.

4.4. Determination of Chemical Compositions

The chemical and enantioselective qualitative analyses of the EO were carried out on an Agilent Technologies GC-MS instrument, consisting of a 6890N gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometry detector (MSD), model 5973 INERT (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The GC was additionally equipped with a common flame ionization detector (FID) that was used for the EO quantitative analysis. The MSD was set in SCAN mode (scan range 40–350 m/z), with the electron ionization (EI) source set at 70 eV. The GC qualitative and quantitative analyses were run on both a non-polar and a polar capillary column. The non-polar column (DB-5ms from Agilent Technologies, 30 m long, 0.25 mm internal diameter, and 0.25 μm film thickness) was based on a 5%-phenyl-methylpolysiloxane stationary phase. The polar column (HP-INNOWax, from Agilent Technologies, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) was based on a polyethylene glycol stationary phase. The GC enantioselective analysis was conducted on a capillary column, based on 2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector. The enantioselective column (25 m × 0.250 mm internal diameter × 0.25 μm phase thickness) was purchased from Mega, Milan, Italy. The carrier gas for all the analyses was helium (GC purity grade from Indura, Guayaquil, Ecuador), set at the constant flow rate of 1 mL/min.

The preparative chromatographic separations of the non-volatile fraction were carried out on open columns at atmospheric pressure (CC). The columns were manually packed with silica gel (Merck Kieselgel 60, 40–63 μm, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) or C18 reversed phase (Merck LiChroprep RP-18, 25–40 μm), both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) analyses were conducted over silica gel 60 (0.25 mm; GF254, Merck) or RP-18 (F254s, Merck) plates (Sigma-Aldrich). TLC plates were initially visualized under UV light (254 and 366 nm); subsequently, they were sprayed with a 0.5% solution of vanillin in H2SO4/ethanol 4:1, and finally heated at 200 °C. For chlorophyll removal, solid-phase extraction (SPE) was carried out in a glass column, manually packed with the same reversed phase cited above. All NMR experiments were carried out with Bruker 300 MHz and Bruker 500 MHz spectrometers (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). All deuterated solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments were carried out on an Enraf-Nonius four-circle diffractometer, model CAD-4 (Enraf-Nonius B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands), applying a graphite monochromated Mo-Kα radiation. The generated ORTEP structure of dehydroleucodine (13) (Figure 5) shows 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. Previously distilled technical grade solvents were used for preparative CC, whereas HPLC-grade solvents (Sigma-Aldrich) were used for all other applications. The mixture of n-alkanes C9–C25 and the internal standard (n-nonane) for GC analyses were analytical grade (purity > 99%), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The calibration standard was isopropyl caproate, synthesized by one of the authors (G.G.) and purified to 98.8% purity (GC-FID).

Semi-preparative HPLC was carried out on a Jasco PU-2080 PLUS dual pump HPLC instrument, equipped with a UV detector (JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The eluent flow was set at 10 mL/min, whereas the UV detector was operated at 215 nm. The sample was injected through a 1.5 mL loop.

4.4.1. GC-MS and GC-FID Analyses

For qualitative analyses of EOs, GC-MS is currently the technique of choice, since very similar volatile compounds can usually be separated with good resolution on a capillary gas chromatographic (GC) column. On the other hand, mass spectrometry (MS) is a detection method that provides information on the structure of an analyte and allows its identification through the analysis of the mass spectrum. The GC-FID technique is used for quantitative analysis since the flame ionization detector (FID) produces relative response factors (RRFs) dependent on the molecular formula and the presence of aromatic rings in the analyte structure.

The qualitative and quantitative analyses of the EO were conducted on both the non-polar and polar columns, using the same temperature program: initially, 60 °C for 5 min, followed by a thermal gradient of 3 °C/min until 180 °C, followed by a second ramp of 10 °C/min until 250 °C, which was maintained for 5 min. The injections were performed in split mode (40:1), with an injection volume of 1 µL. For each chromatographic peak, the linear retention index (LRI) was calculated according to Van Den Dool and Kratz, referred to a mixture of a homologous series of n-alkanes (C9–C25) [76]. The constituents of the volatile fraction were identified by comparing their MS spectra and LRI values with the literature. For quantification, a relative response factor (RRF) was at first calculated for each oil component, referred to isopropyl caproate as the calibration standard. The RRFs were mathematically obtained with the assumption that in GC-FID, under the above-mentioned conditions, they only depend on combustion enthalpy [77,78]. Subsequently, the content of each component in the EO was calculated from the corrected area of the corresponding peak, which was interpolated using a calibration curve, traced for each column [16]. Both curves showed a correlation coefficient of 0.995. Finally, the analytical yield of the EO was calculated from the total amount of the volatile fraction, which corresponded to the sum of the areas of all peaks in the gas chromatogram, corrected by a mean RRF value.

4.4.2. Enantioselective GC Analysis

The enantioselective analysis was carried out by GC-MS, since β-cyclodextrin-based capillary columns allow to separate volatile enantiomers with high resolution, whereas mass spectrometry permits to confirm the presence of enantiomeric pairs, due to the identity of their mass spectra. The enantioselective analysis was performed using the same method and instrument configuration as the qualitative analyses, except for the oven temperature program that was as follows: initially, 60 °C for 5 min, followed by a gradient of 2 °C/min up to 220 °C, which were maintained for 2 min. In addition, in this case, the LRIs were calculated according to Van Den Dool and Kratz [76]. The elution order of the enantiomers was determined by injecting enantiomerically pure standards.

4.4.3. Metabolite Purification and NMR Analysis

The chlorophyll-free polar extract (2.3 g) was separated through a column of silica gel (200 g), eluted with a gradient of Hex and ethyl acetate (EtOAc), from 3% to 50% EtOAc, for a total of 1.6 L. After TLC analysis, the collected fractions (8 mL each) with similar composition were brought together, obtaining 24 main fractions, from OM-1 to OM-24. From fraction OM-12, dehydroleucodine (13, 337 mg) spontaneously crystallized as the most abundant metabolite. Subsequently, novanin (16, 20 mg) was separated from fraction OM-8 by reversed-phase chromatography (isocratic 85% aqueous MeOH).

The fractions from OM-1 to OM-3 were brought together (33.1 mg) and separated by a column of silica gel (3 g). Elution with Hex-EtOAc, from 0% until 50% EtOAc, afforded pure kauniolide (14, 2 mg).

A mixture of two or more components of very similar polarity are usually inseparable by standard CC. In this case, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) can be used due to its higher chromatographic resolution. For this reason, the fractions from OM-13 to OM-15 were brought together (110.2 mg) and separated on an HPLC-UV instrument, using a hand-packed semi-preparative reversed-phase column (45 g). The eluent was a mixture of MeCN-H2O (30:70), held for 3 min, followed by a 17 min increasing gradient until 100% MeCN, held for 20 min. Compounds 15 (3.0 mg) and 17 (5.6 mg) were isolated in a pure form.

Another HPLC-UV separation of OM-4 (56.9 mg), carried out with MeCN-H2O mixtures, from 20% MeCN (3 min) to 100% MeCN in 20 min, afforded compound 18 (23 mg).

Finally, the residue R described in Section 4.3. was chromatographed on a column of silica gel (250 g). Elution with a polarity gradient, from 100% EtOAc to EtOAc-MeCO2H-HCO2H-H2O (76:8:8:8), afforded pure 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (20, 198.9 mg) and semi-purified eupalitin-3-O-glucoside (19). Reversed-phase chromatography with a gradient of aqueous MeOH finally afforded pure compound 19 (7.6 mg). Subsequently, as is customary in phytochemical studies, all the purified compounds were submitted to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and MS spectrometry analysis, and the chemical structures were elucidated by spectra interpretation. All the isolated compounds 1320 resulted to have already been described in the literature, and their 1H and 13C NMR spectra were identical with published data [18,19,20,45,46,47,48]. As regards dehydroleucodine (13), X-ray diffraction was also chosen as the structure elucidation method, due to the spontaneous tendency of this sesquiterpene lactone to produce high-quality crystals.

5. Conclusions

The leaves of K. longipetiolata, a plant native to Ecuador, afforded by steam distillation an essential oil not yet investigated, with a yield of 0.13% (w/w) in dry plant material. Due to the chemical composition, especially for the presence of high amounts of α-zingiberene (1) and ar-curcumene (2), the oil has a therapeutic potential in the treatment of pathologies, in which processes such as inflammation and angiogenesis are exacerbated. Enantioselective analysis of the EO indicated that the biosynthetic pathways, leading to a few terpenoid components, involved two separate enzyme systems, each capable of elaborating a single enantiomer. Moreover, the non-volatile fraction of K. longipetiolata proved to be a rich source of the antitumor guaianolide dehydroleucodine (13), which could be easily purified with a yield > 3.8% (w/w) on the total methanol extract.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Carlo Bicchi (University of Turin, Italy) for his support with enantiomerically pure standards. We also thank the Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL) for supporting open-access publication.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.V. and G.G.; investigation, O.M., C.B. and N.C.; data curation, O.M. and G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, G.G.; writing—review and editing, O.M., G.V. and G.G.; supervision, G.V. and G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available from the authors (O.M. and C.B.)

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was partly funded by the European Union, program Alban, fellowship no. E04D038362EC (2005–2007).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Malagón O., Ramírez J., Andrade J., Morocho V., Armijos C., Gilardoni G. Phytochemistry and Ethnopharmacology of the Ecuadorian Flora. A Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016;11:297. doi: 10.1177/1934578X1601100307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Armijos C., Ramírez J., Salinas M., Vidari G., Suárez A.I. Pharmacology and Phytochemistry of Ecuadorian Medicinal Plants: An Update and Perspectives. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:1145. doi: 10.3390/ph14111145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Megadiverse Countries, UNEP-WCMC. [(accessed on 18 July 2022)]. Available online: https://www.biodiversitya-z.org/content/megadiverse-countries.
  • 4.Chiriboga X., Gilardoni G., Magnaghi I., Vita Finzi P., Zanoni G., Vidari G. New Anthracene Derivatives from Coussarea macrophylla. J. Nat. Prod. 2003;66:905. doi: 10.1021/np030066i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Quílez A., Berenguer B., Gilardoni G., Souccar C., De Mendonça S., Oliveira L.F.S., Martin-Calero M.J., Vidari G. Anti-secretory, Anti-inflammatory, and Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activities of Several Fractions Isolated from Piper carpunya Ruiz & Pav. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010;128:583. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.01.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gilardoni G., Tosi S., Mellerio G., Maldonado M.E., Chiriboga X., Vidari G. Lipophilic Components from the Ecuadorian Plant Schistocarpha eupatorioides. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011;6:767. doi: 10.1177/1934578X1100600606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gilardoni G., Malagon O., Morocho V., Negri R., Tosi S., Guglielminetti M., Vidari G., Vita Finzi P. Phytochemical Research and Antimicrobial Activity of Clinopodium nubigenum Kunth (Kuntze) Raw Extracts. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2011;21:850. doi: 10.1590/S0102-695X2011005000139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gilardoni G., Chiriboga X., Finzi P.V., Vidari G. New 3,4-Secocycloartane and 3,4-Secodammarane Triterpenes from the Ecuadorian Plant Coussarea macrophylla. Chem. Biodivers. 2015;12:946. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201400182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Herrera C., Pérez Y., Morocho V., Armijos C., Malagón O., Brito B., Tacán M., Cartuche L., Gilardoni G. Preliminary Phytochemical Study of the Ecuadorian Plant Croton elegans Kunth. (Euphorbiaceae) J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2018;63:3788. doi: 10.4067/s0717-97072018000103875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morocho V., Valarezo L.P., Tapia D.A., Cartuche L., Cumbicus N., Gilardoni G. A Rare Dirhamnosyl Flavonoid and Other Radical-scavenging Metabolites from Cynophalla mollis (Kunth) J. Presl and Colicodendron scabridum (Kunt) Seem. (Capparaceae) of Ecuador. Chem. Biodivers. 2021;16:e2100260. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.202100260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilardoni G., Montalván M., Vélez M., Malagón O. Chemical and Enantioselective Analysis of the Essential Oils from Different Morphological Structures of Ocotea quixos (Lam.) Kosterm. Plants. 2021;10:2171. doi: 10.3390/plants10102171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Calvopiña K., Malagón O., Capetti F., Sgorbini B., Verdugo V., Gilardoni G. A New Sesquiterpene Essential Oil from the Native Andean Species Jungia rugosa Less (Asteraceae): Chemical Analysis, Enantiomeric Evaluation, and Cholinergic Activity. Plants. 2021;10:2102. doi: 10.3390/plants10102102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramírez J., Andrade M.D., Vidari G., Gilardoni G. Essential Oil and Major Non-Volatile Secondary Metabolites from the Leaves of Amazonian Piper subscutatum. Plants. 2021;10:1168. doi: 10.3390/plants10061168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Espinosa S., Bec N., Larroque C., Ramírez J., Sgorbini B., Bicchi C., Cumbicus N., Gilardoni G. A Novel Chemical Profile of a Selective In Vitro Cholinergic Essential Oil from Clinopodium taxifolium (Kunth) Govaerts (Lamiaceae), a Native Andean Species of Ecuador. Molecules. 2021;26:45. doi: 10.3390/molecules26010045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gilardoni G., Montalván M., Ortiz M., Vinueza D., Montesinos J.V. The Flower Essential Oil of Dalea mutisii Kunth (Fabaceae) from Ecuador: Chemical, Enantioselective, and Olfactometric Analyses. Plants. 2020;9:1403. doi: 10.3390/plants9101403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gilardoni G., Matute Y., Ramírez J. Chemical and Enantioselective Analysis of the Leaf Essential Oil from Piper coruscans Kunth (Piperaceae), a Costal and Amazonian Native Species of Ecuador. Plants. 2020;9:791. doi: 10.3390/plants9060791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Malagón O., Cartuche P., Montaño A., Cumbicus N., Gilardoni G. A New Essential Oil from the Leaves of the Endemic Andean Species Gynoxys miniphylla Cuatrec. (Asteraceae): Chemical and Enantioselective Analyses. Plants. 2022;11:398. doi: 10.3390/plants11030398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bohlmann F., Kramp W., Gupta R.K., King R.M., Robinson H. Four Guaianolides and Other Constituents from Three Kaunia Species. Phytochemistry. 1981;20:2375. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82669-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bohlmann F., Trinks C., Jakupovic J., King R.M., Robinson H. A Further Guaianolide from Kaunia arbuscularis. Planta Med. 1984;50:284. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-969708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Gutierrez A.N., Sigstad E.E., Catalán C.A.N., Gutierrez A.B., Herz W. Guaianolides from Kaunia lasiophthalma. Phytochemistry. 1990;29:1219. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(90)85432-F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jorgensen P., Leon-Yanez S. Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Ecuador. Missouri Botanical Garden Press; St. Louis, MO, USA: 1999. p. 291. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Viera Barreto J.N., Sancho G. Taxonomic revision of Kaunia (Eupatorieae, Asteraceae), an Andean genus with presence in eastern South America. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2019;104:664–703. doi: 10.3417/2019415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden. [(accessed on 18 July 2022)]. Available online: https://www.tropicos.org.
  • 24.WFO The World Flora Online. [(accessed on 5 September 2022)]. Available online: www.worldfloraonline.org.
  • 25.Babushok V.I., Linstrom P.J., Zenkevich I.G. Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2011;40:043101. doi: 10.1063/1.3653552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Blanc M.C., Muselli A., Bradesi P., Casanova J. Chemical composition and variability of the essential oil of Inula graveolens from Corsica. Flavour Fragr. J. 2004;19:314. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ngassoum M.B., Yonkeu S., Jirovetz L., Buchbauer G., Schmaus G., Hammerschmidt F.J. Chemical composition of essential oils of Lantana camara leaves and flowers from Cameroon and Madagascar. Flavour Fragr. J. 1999;14:245. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1026(199907/08)14:4<245::AID-FFJ819>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cavalli J.F., Tomi F., Bernardini A.F., Casanova J. Composition and chemical variability of the bark oil of Cedrelopsis grevei H. Baillon from Madagascar. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003;18:532. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lopez-Arze J.B., Collin G., Garneau F.X., Jean F.I., Gagnon H. Essential Oils from Bolivia II. Asteraceae: Ophryosporus heptanthus (Wedd.) H. Rob. et King. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004;16:374. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2004.9698747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Flamini G., Tebano M., Cioni P.L., Bagci Y., Dural H., Ertugrul K., Uysal T., Savran A. A multivariate statistical approach to Centaurea classification using essential oil composition data of some species from Turkey. Plant Syst. Evol. 2006;261:217. doi: 10.1007/s00606-006-0448-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tabanca N., Kirimer N., Demirci B., Demirci F., Can-Başer K.H. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of Micromeria cristata subsp. phrygia and the enantiomeric distribution of borneol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49:4300. doi: 10.1021/jf0105034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Polini J., Tomi P., Bernardini A.F., Bradesi P., Casanova J., Kaloustian J. Detailed analysis of the essential oil from Cistus albidus L. by combination of GC/RI, GC/MS and 13C-NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008;22:1270. doi: 10.1080/14786410701766083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sylvestre M., Pichette A., Longtin A., Nagau F., Legault J. Essential oil analysis and anticancer activity of leaf essential oil of Croton flavens L. from Guadeloupe. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:99. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mondello L., Zappia G., Cotroneo A., Bonaccorsi I., Chowdhury J.U., Yusuf M., Dugo G. Studies on the essential oil-bearing plants of Bangladesh. Part VIII. Composition of some Ocimum oils O. basilicum L. var. purpurascens; O. sanctum L. green; O. sanctum L. purple; O. americanum L., citral type; O. americanum L., camphor type. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002;17:335. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bisio A., Ciarallo G., Romussi G., Fontana N., Mascolo N., Capasso R., Biscardi D. Chemical Composition of Essential Oils from some Salvia species. Phytother. Res. 1998;12:s117. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(1998)12:1+<S117::AID-PTR269>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boussaada O., Ammar S., Saidana D., Chriaa J., Chraif I., Daami M., Helal A.N., Mighri Z. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of volatile components from capitula and aerial parts of Rhaponticum acaule DC growing wild in Tunisia. Microbiol. Res. 2008;163:87. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2007.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adams R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas. Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. 4th ed. Allured Publishing Corporation; Carol Stream, IL, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Marongiu B., Piras A., Porcedda S., Scorciapino A. Chemical composition of the essential oil and supercritical CO2 extract of Commiphora myrrha (Nees) Engl. and of Acorus calamus L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:7939. doi: 10.1021/jf051100x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kukić J., Petrović S., Pavlović M., Couladis M., Tzakou O., Niketić M. Composition of essential oil of Stachys alpina L. ssp. dinarica Murb. Flavour Fragr. J. 2006;21:539. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zheng C., Kim T., Kim K., Leem Y., Lee H. Characterization of potent aroma compounds in Chrysanthemum coronarium L. (Garland) using aroma extract dilution analysis. Flavour Fragr. J. 2004;19:401. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Irwin M.A., Geismann T.A. Novanin: A germacranolide from Artemisia nova. Phytochemistry. 1973;12:875. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(73)80694-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huneck S., Zdero C., Bohlmann F. Seco-guaianolides and other constituents from Artemisia species. Phytochemistry. 1986;25:883. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(86)80021-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jakupovic L., Chau-Thi T.V., Warning U., Bohlmann F., Greger H. 11β,13-Dihydroguaianolides from Artemisia douglasiana and a thiophene acetylene from A. schmidtiana. Phytochemistry. 1986;25:1663. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81231-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gonzalez A.G., Bermejo Barrera J., Diaz J.G., Zaragoza Garcia T., de Paz P.P. Distribution of Acetylenes and Sesquiterpene Lactones in Argyranthemum from Tenerife. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1988;16:17. doi: 10.1016/0305-1978(88)90111-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sy L.K., Brown G.D. Oxygenated Bisabolanes from Alpinia densibracteata. Phytochemistry. 1997;45:537. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Khajuria R.K., Suri K.A., Suri O.M., Atal C.K. 3,5,4′-Trihydroxy-6,7-dimethoxyflavone-3-glucoside from Sesuvium portulacastrum. Phytochemistry. 1982;21:1179. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)82450-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wald B., Wray V., Galensa R., Herrmann K. Malonated Flavonol Glycosides and 3,5-Dicafeoylquinic Acid from Pears. Phytochemistry. 1989;28:663. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(89)80083-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Islam M.S., Yoshimoto M., Yahara S., Okuno S., Ishiguro K., Yamakawa O. Identification and Characterization of Foliar Polyphenolic Composition in Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Genotypes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50:3718. doi: 10.1021/jf020120l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sharifi-Rad M., Varoni E.M., Salehi B., Sharifi-Rad J., Matthews K.R., Ayatollahi S.A., Kobarfard F., Ibrahim S.A., Mnayer D., Zakaria Z.A., et al. Plants of the Genus Zingiber as a Source of Bioactive Phytochemicals: From Tradition to Pharmacy. Molecules. 2017;22:2145. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mesomo M.C., Corazza M.L., Ndiaye P.M., Dalla Santa O.R., Cardozo L., de Paula Scheer A. Supercritical CO2 extracts and essential oil of ginger (Zingiber officinale R.): Chemical composition and antibacterial activity. J. Supercrit. Fluid. 2013;80:44. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2013.03.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.El-Baroty G.S., El-Baky H.A., Farag R.S., Saleh M.A. Characterization of antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds of cinnamon and ginger essential oils. Afr. J. Biochem. Res. 2010;4:167. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sasidharan I., Nirmala M. Comparative chemical composition and antimicrobial activity fresh & dry ginger oils (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2010;2:40. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Singh G., Maurya S., Catalan C., de Lampasona M.P. Studies on essential oils, Part 42: Chemical, antifungal, antioxidant and sprout suppressant studies on ginger essential oil and its oleoresin. Flavour Fragr. J. 2005;20:1. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bou D.D., Lago J.H.G., Figueiredo C.R., Matsuo A.L., Guadagnin R.C., Soares M.G., Sartorelli P. Chemical composition and cytotoxicity evaluation of essential oil from leaves of Casearia sylvestris, its main compound α-zingiberene and derivatives. Molecules. 2013;18:9477. doi: 10.3390/molecules18089477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee Y. Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Essential Oil and its Component from Zingiber officinale Roscoe. Toxicol. Res. 2016;32:225. doi: 10.5487/TR.2016.32.3.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Denyer C.V., Jackson P., Loakes D.M., Ellis M.R., Young D.A.B. Isolation of Antirhinoviral Sesquiterpenes from Ginger (Zingiber officinale) J. Nat. Prod. 1994;57:658. doi: 10.1021/np50107a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ferreira B.A., Silva R.F., de Moura F.B.R., Narduchi C.T., Deconte S.R., Sartorelli P., Tomiosso T.C., Lago J.H.G., Araújo F.A. α-Zingiberene, a sesquiterpene from essential oil from leaves of Casearia sylvestris, suppresses inflammatory angiogenesis and stimulates collagen deposition in subcutaneous implants in mice. Nat Prod Res. 2021 doi: 10.1080/14786419.2021.2019729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Itokawa H., Hirayama F., Funakoshi K., Takeya K. Studies on the antitumor bisabolane sesquiterpenoids isolated from Curcuma xanthorrhiza. Chem. Pharmacol. Bull. 1985;33:3488. doi: 10.1248/cpb.33.3488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamahara J., Hatakeyama S., Tamiguchi K., Kawamura M., Yoshikawa M. Stomachic principles in ginger. II. Pungent and anti-ulcer effects of low polar constituents isolated from ginger, the dried rhizoma of Zingiber officinale Roscoe cultivated in Taiwan. The absolute stereostructure of a new diarylheptanoid. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1992;112:645. doi: 10.1248/yakushi1947.112.9_645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Al Shebly M.M., AlQahtani F.S., Govindarajan M., Gopinath K., Vijayan P., Benelli G. Toxicity of ar-curcumene and epi-β-bisabolol from Hedychium larsenii (Zingiberaceae) essential oil on malaria, chikungunya and St. Louis encephalitis mosquito vectors. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017;137:149. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Podlogar J.A., Verspohl E.J. Antiinflammatory Effects of Ginger and Some of its Components in Human Bronchial Epithelial (BEAS-2B) Cells. Phytother. Res. 2012;26:333. doi: 10.1002/ptr.3558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mayer R.J., Allihn P.W.A., Hampel N., Mayer P., Sieber S.A., Armin R., Ofial A.R. Electrophilic reactivities of cyclic enones and α,β-unsaturated lactones. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:4850. doi: 10.1039/D0SC06628A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lagoutte R., Winssinger N. Following the Lead from Nature with Covalent Inhibitors. Chimia. 2017;71:703. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2017.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Simonsen H.T., Weitzel C., Christensen S.B. Guaianolide Sesquiterpenoids: Pharmacology and Biosynthesis. In: Ramawat K., Mérillon J.M., editors. Natural Products. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2013. pp. 3069–3098. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fadayomi I., Sari S., Kitchena M., Reynissona J., Forsytha N., Li W.-W. Sesquiterpene Lactones Modulated DNA Methylation through Inhibition of DNMTs in Ovarian Cancer Cells. Pharmacol. Res. Modern Chin. Med. 2022;3:100074. doi: 10.1016/j.prmcm.2022.100074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.de Heluani C.S., de Lampasona M.P., Catalán C.A.N., Goedken V.L., Gutiérrez A.B., Herz W. Guaianolides, heliangolides and other constituents from Stevia alpina. Phytochemistry. 1989;28 doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97889-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nogueira de Melo G.A., Grespan R., Fonseca J.P., Farinha T.O., da Silva E.L., Romero A.L., Cuman R.K.N. Inhibitory effects of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) essential oil on leukocyte migration in vivo and in vitro. J. Nat. Med. 2011;65:241. doi: 10.1007/s11418-010-0479-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mery D.E., Compadre A.J., Ordóñez P.E., Selvik E.J., Morocho V., Contreras J., Malagón O., Jones D.E., Breen P.J., Balick M.J., et al. Analysis of Plant–Plant Interactions Reveals the Presence of Potent Antileukemic Compounds. Molecules. 2022;27:2928. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ordóñez P.E., Mery D.E., Sharma K.K., Nemu S., Reynolds W.F., Enriquez R.G., Burns D.C., Malagón O., Jones D.E., Guzman M.L., et al. Synthesis, Crystallography, and Anti-Leukemic Activity of the Amino Adducts of Dehydroleucodine. Molecules. 2020;25:4825. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bailon-Moscoso N., Gonzalez-Arevalo G., Velasquez-Rojas G., Malagon O., Vidari G., Zentella-Dehesa A., Ratovitski E.A., Ostrosky-Wegman P. Phytometabolite Dehydroleucodine Induces Cell Cycle Arrest, Apoptosis, and DNA Damage in Human Astrocytoma Cells through p73/p53 Regulation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136527. Correction in PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ordonez P.E., Sharma K.K., Bystrom L.M., Alas M.A., Enriquez R.G., Malagon O., Jones D.E., Guzman M.L., Compadre C.M. Dehydroleucodine, a Sesquiterpene Lactone from Gynoxys verrucosa, Demonstrates Cytotoxic Activity against Human Leukemia Cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2016;79:691. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ordonez P.E., Quave C.L., Reynolds W.F., Varughese K.I., Berry B., Breen P.J., Malagon O., Smeltzer M.S., Compadre C.M. Sesquiterpene Lactones from Gynoxys verrucosa and Their Anti-MRSA Activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Compadre C.M., Ordonez P.E., Guzman M.L., Jones D.E., Malagon O., Vidari G., Crooks P. Dehydroleucodine Derivatives for Treatment of Cancer. WO2015006715A1. U.S. Patent. 2015 January 15;
  • 74.Delle Monache G., Delle Monache F., Becerra J., Silva M., Menichini F. Thymol Derivatives from Eupatorium glechonophyllum. Phytochemistry. 1984;23:1947. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84947-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dewick P.M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; Chichester, UK: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Van Den Dool H., Kratz P.D. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1963;11:463. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.De Saint Laumer J.Y., Cicchetti E., Merle P., Egger J., Chaintreau A. Quantification in Gas Chromatography: Prediction of Flame Ionization Detector Response Factors from Combustion Enthalpies and Molecular Structures. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:6457. doi: 10.1021/ac1006574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tissot E., Rochat S., Debonneville C., Chaintreau A. Rapid GC-FID quantification technique without authentic samples using predicted response factors. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012;27:290. doi: 10.1002/ffj.3098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available from the authors (O.M. and C.B.)


Articles from Plants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES