Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 28;14(21):4553. doi: 10.3390/nu14214553

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis on the association between the DII and CHD.

Nonadjusted Model Model I Model II
OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value OR (95% CI) p-Value
DII 1.09 (1.05, 1.14) <0.001 *** 1.17 (1.11, 1.22] <0.001 *** 1.08 (1.03, 1.14)) 0.005
Q1 Reference - Reference - Reference -
Q2 0.99 (0.87, 1.12) 0.849 1.05 (0.93, 1.2) 0.512 0.98 (0.86, 1.11) 0.776
Q3 1.14 (1.01, 1.29) 0.067 * 1.3 (1.15, 1.48) <0.001 *** 1.15 (1.01, 1.31) 0.041 *
Q4 1.26 (1.12, 1.42) 0.001 ** 1.48 (1.31, 1.68) <0.001 *** 1.24 (1.09, 1.41) 0.007 **

Data are presented as OR (95% CI). Model I adjusted for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Model II adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education levels, smoking, drinking, diabetes, hypertension, and BMI. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; DII, Dietary Inflammation Index; Q1, first quartile; Q2, second quartile; Q3, third quartile; Q4, fourth quartile. *** p-value < 0.001, ** p-value < 0.01, * p-value < 0.05.