Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 30;19(21):14192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114192

Table 3.

Certainty of evidence.

Certainty Assessment No. of Participants Effect Certainty
Outcome (No. of Studies) Study Design Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Interv. Control Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Balance (BBS)
Vs conventional RCT Serious Not serious Not serious Serious 126 121 - 0.63
(0.34–0.92)
Low
Vs no intervention RCT Serious Serious Not serious Serious 59 58 - 0.94
(0.21–1.87)
Very Low
Risk of falls (TUG)
Vs conventional RCT Serious Serious Not serious Serious 114 95 - −0.55
(−1.07–0.04)
Very Low
Vs no intervention RCT Serious Serious Not serious Serious 121 120 - −0.87
(−1.52–−0.23)
Very Low