Table 3.
Certainty Assessment | No. of Participants | Effect | Certainty | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcome (No. of Studies) | Study Design | Risk of Bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Interv. | Control | Relative (95% CI) | Absolute (95% CI) | |
Balance (BBS) | ||||||||||
Vs conventional | RCT | Serious | Not serious | Not serious | Serious | 126 | 121 | - | 0.63 (0.34–0.92) |
Low |
Vs no intervention | RCT | Serious | Serious | Not serious | Serious | 59 | 58 | - | 0.94 (0.21–1.87) |
Very Low |
Risk of falls (TUG) | ||||||||||
Vs conventional | RCT | Serious | Serious | Not serious | Serious | 114 | 95 | - | −0.55 (−1.07–0.04) |
Very Low |
Vs no intervention | RCT | Serious | Serious | Not serious | Serious | 121 | 120 | - | −0.87 (−1.52–−0.23) |
Very Low |