Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 25;11(21):3365. doi: 10.3390/cells11213365

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Patient Characteristics Responders
n = 19
Non-Responders
n = 38
Age *; years; median (range) 61 (49–83) 66 (47–84)
Sex; n (%)
Female 7 (37) 20 (53)
Male 12 (63) 18 (47)
Immunoglobulin subtype *; n (%)
IgG 12 (63) 25 (66)
IgA 1 (5) 3 (8)
Light-chain only 6 (32) 9 (23.5)
Non secretory 0 (0) 1 (2.5)
ISS *; n(%)
I 5 (26) 13 (34)
II 8 (42) 8 (21)
III 4 (21) 5 (13)
Unknown 2 (11) 12 (32)
ECOG performance status *; n (%)
0 9 (47) 20 (53)
1 7 (37) 6 (16)
2 0 (0) 0 (0)
3 0 (0) 2 (5)
Unknown 3 (16) 10 (26)
Fluorescence in situ hybridization §; n (%)
High-risk 1 (5) 9 (24)
Standard-risk 15 (79) 19 (50)
Unknown 3 (16) 10 (26)
Number of prior lines of therapy; median (range) 2 (1–5) 4 (0–17)

* = at the time of diagnosis of multiple myeloma. § = If assessed more than once, the most recent result prior to initiation of DARA treatment is shown. High-risk aberrations were defined by the presence of either t(4;14), t(14;16) or del17p, each detected with a cut-off of 10% according to national standards for cytogenetic evaluation [45].