Skip to main content
. 1999 Jun;67(6):2776–2782. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.6.2776-2782.1999

TABLE 1.

Equine isolates used in this studya

Warwick strain no. Supplier’s strain no. Yr isolated Site of isolation Country/county of isolatione Source
495/Pn138 409 1993 Nasopharynx United Kingdom/West Suffolk N. Chanterb
496/Pn139 7731 1992 Nasopharynx United Kingdom/West Suffolk N. Chanter
497/Pn140 600142 1996 Nasopharynx United Kingdom/West Suffolk N. Chanter
498/Pn141 3307 1992 Nasopharynx United Kingdom/West Sussex N. Chanter
499/Pn142 4826 1992 Nasopharynx United Kingdom/West Suffolk N. Chanter
500/Pn143d 4778 1992 Tracheal wash United Kingdom/East Suffolk N. Chanter
501/Pn144 5330 1992 Nasopharynx United Kingdom/West Suffolk N. Chanter
502/Pn145 21 1987 Tracheal wash Ireland J. F. Timoneyc
503/Pn146 5 1987 Tracheal wash Ireland J. F. Timoney
504/Pn147 15 1987 Tracheal wash Ireland J. F. Timoney
505/Pn148 17 1987 Tracheal wash Ireland J. F. Timoney
a

All strains tested were optochin sensitive and bound a 16S RNA, species-specific gene probe. 

b

Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, United Kingdom. 

c

Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky. 

d

Isolate 500 was not examined in RFLP studies of housekeeping genes and virulence factors. 

e

All West Suffolk isolates originated from distinct stables.