Table 3.

Comparison of results with other methods.

Method		Objtect	Accrancy
Ours	Semantic Segmentation	Defect	96.4%
		Cracks	87.83%
Article [37]	Bayesian classification	Defect	75%
Article [38]	YOLOv4	Defect	92.54%
Article [39]	k-Means Clustering	Defect	90.9%
Article [40]	Eddy Current	Crack Depth < 2 mm	86%
		Crack Depth: 2–6 mm	88%
Article [41]	Magnetic Particle Inspection	Crack Length: 2.5–5.0 mm	95%
		Crack Length: 2–2.5 mm	50%
		Crack Length: 1–1.5 mm	30%
		Crack Length < 1 mm	0%