Table 1.
Prior research | Definition collective intelligence | Research questions | Study number | Sample | Number of teams | Treatment | Research design | Major findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woolley et al. (2010) | “the general ability of the group to perform a wide variety of tasks” p. 687 | Does a collective intelligence factor exist for groups of people? | Study 1 | General population United States | 40 | Face-to-face | Observational design using correlations | - Empirical support for existence c-factor - Individual intelligence score is not correlated with c-factor - C-factor predicts group performance better than average or maximum individual intelligence - Average social sensitivity predicts c-factor - Number of speaking turns is negatively correlated with the c-factor |
Study 2 | 152 | |||||||
Engel et al. (2014) | “It is a measure of the general effectiveness of a group on a wide range of tasks” p. 3 | Does the c-factor arise in online groups and what is the role of social sensitivity? | Study 1 | General population United States | 32 | Face-to-face | Observational design using correlations | - Empirical support for existence c-factor - Reading the mind in the eyes test predicts the c-factor in face-to-face and online conditions - Total amount of communication positively correlates with the c-factor |
36 | Online | |||||||
Engel et al. (2015) | “is a property of groups that emerges from the coordination and collaboration of members and predicts group performance on a wide range of task” p. 3769 | Does the c-factor emerge across a variety of settings? | Study 1 | General population United States | 68 | Face-to-face; text chat | Meta-analytic design using factor analytic approaches and correlations | - Empirical support for existence of the c-factor in different cultural settings, across communication media and group contexts - C-factor is correlated with performance on complex tasks |
Study 2 | German student sample | 25 | Face-to-face; video; voice; text chat | |||||
Study 3 | Japanese organizational context | 116 | Online | |||||
Barlow and Dennis (2016) | “an ability of groups to perform consistently well across a variety of group-based tasks’’ p. 685 | How does the c-factor manifest itself in computer mediated communication structures? | Study 1 | Student sample in Midwestern university business school | 86 | Online | Correlational | - No empirical support for the existence of the c-factor in computer mediated context |
Bates and Gupta (2017) | “strong general ability or group IQ factor” p. 46 | What allows groups to behave intelligently? | Study 1 | Student sample | 26 | Face-to-face | Correlational | - Empirical support for existence c-factor, but individual IQ accounted for the majority of group-IQ differences |
Study 2 | General population India | 40 | Face-to-face | Correlational | ||||
Study 3 | General population Scotland | 40 | Face-to-face | Correlational | ||||
Kim et al. (2017) | “ability of the group to perform across a wide variety of tasks” p. 2 | Does the c-factor translates into the world of teams in online video games? | Study 1 | Gamers in North America | 248 | Online | Correlational | - The c-factor predicts a team’s future performance in League of Legend game - Social perceptiveness is a significant positive predictor of the c-factor |