Skip to main content
. 2022 Autumn;13(4):772–779. doi: 10.22088/cjim.13.4.772

Table 4.

Prevalence of Suspected LS and LS in different studies

Authors, year Population
(N)
MMR-deficient (suspected LS)
N (%)
MMR-deficient (suspected LS) in EEC ˨
N (%)
Most prevalent MMR-deficient LS in
MMR-deficient
N (%)
LS in EC ˨
(%)
LS in EEC
N (%)
Arab M et al, 2021 100 23 (23) 22 (24.17)
Ismael, 2020 (17) 60 28 (45) All loss, PMS2
Dondi, 2020 (5) 239 96 (40) MLH1, PMS2 18 (18.75) 7.5
Gordhandas, 2020 (18) 7057 1612 (23) MLH1 212/900
(24)
3
Saeki, 2019 (19) 98 23 (23.5)
Reijnen*, 2019 (7) 128 57 (44.5)
Chao, 2019 (20) 111 26 (23.5) MLH1/PMS2 6 (23%) 5.4 6/87(6.89)
Kahn, 2019 (21) 5917 1672 (28) MSH2 206(12.3%) 3
Backes*, 2019 (8) 197 64 (32.48) 64 (32.48)
Kim, 2018 (22) 173˨ 45 (26) 45 (26) MLH1/PMS2
Cosgrove, 2017 (23) 466 116 (24.9) MLH1/PMS2
Mass-Moya. 2016 (16) 215 72 (33) 11/52 (21.15)
Mills, 2016 (10) 210 66 (31.4) MLH1, PMS2 7/55 (26.2) 3.33
Buchanan, 2014 (24) 702 170 (24) MLH1/PMS2 22 (13) 3 21/572 (3.7)
Ferguson, 2014 (25) 118 34 (29) MLH1, PMS2 7 (20.58) 5.9
Peterson, 2012 (26) 98 23 (24) MLH1/PMS2
Total 15087 4104 (27.20) 131/461 (28.4) 489/3005 (16.27) 489/14354
(3.40)
27/659 (4.11)

EC: Endometrial cancer, EEC: Endometrioid endometrial cancer *In Backes and Reijnen studies, high risk population were included