TABLE 2.
G1 (n = 37) |
G2 (n = 24) |
G3 (n = 26) |
G4 (n = 27) |
|
BMI | 20.4 (1.8) | 20.8 (1.7) | 21.3 (2.3) | 20.7 (2.1) |
Difference1 | 0.99 (0.72–1.36) | 1.12 (0.85–1.67) | 1.33 (0.96–1.84) | Reference |
Fat mass | 24.9 (3.9) | 24.7 (4.7) | 25.3 (4.3) | 25.9 (4.9) |
Difference1 | 0.95 (0.82–1.10) | 0.90 (0.77–1.05) | 0.92 (0.78–1.05) | Reference |
CONGA1120 | 2.3 (0.5)b | 1.5 (0.5)c | 2.8 (0.8)a | 3.0 (0.7)a |
iAUC60–120% | 34.5 (8.5)b | 39.1 (6.3)b | 38.9 (10.0)b | 45.9 (4.8)a |
iAUC120 | 258.5 (44.9)c | 208.0 (36.6)d | 323.9 (68.7)b | 394.3 (61.1)a |
NAUC120 | 0.0 (0.1)ab | 0 (0.0)b | 0.0 (1.4)a | 0.0 (0.0)b |
Peak120 | 4.1 (0.6)b | 3.2 (0.5)c | 4.7 (0.7)a | 5.1 (0.8)a |
Nadir120 | 0.5 (0.7)b | 0.8 (0.4)b | 0.4 (1.2)b | 1.8 (0.7)a |
SD120 | 1.5 (0.2)b | 1.0 (0.2)c | 1.7 (0.3)a | 1.7 (0.3)a |
Values are mean (SD), except that NAUC120 is median (first quartile, third quartile).
1Difference (95% CI) from multinomial logistic regression models. a, b, c, d, used for comparison of glycemic parameters between groups based on one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.05).