TABLE 4.
Body mass index (BMI), fat mass, and glycemic parameters calculated over 120 min of white rice (WR) clusters (n = 114).
| WR1 (n = 16) |
WR2 (n = 38) |
WR3 (n = 43) |
WR4 (n = 17) |
|
| BMI | 20.4 (1.4) | 20.6 (1.9) | 21.1 (2.3) | 20.4 (1.72) |
| Difference1 | 1.09 (0.70–1.69) | 1.08 (0.75–1.56) | 1.31 (0.92–0.87) | Reference |
| Fat mass | 24.3 (4.1) | 25.4 (4.4) | 25.3 (4.5) | 25.27 (4.5) |
| Difference1 | 0.93 (0.77–1.12) | 0.99 (0.84–1.16) | 0.94 (0.80–1.1) | Reference |
| CONGA1120 | 1.1 (0.5)%b | 2.3 (0.6)%a | 1.5 (0.3)%b | 2.4 (0.7)%a |
| iAUC60–120% | 34.9 (12.6)%c | 47.4 (10.5)%b | 56.9 (8.3)%a | 60.6 (8.41)%a |
| iAUC120 | 130.5 (30.6)%d | 247.3 (46.8)%b | 203.6 (40.8)%c | 321.6 (39.4)%a |
| NAUC120 | 0.0 (0.6)%b | 0.0 (0.0)%a | 0.0 (0.0)%a | 0.0 (0.0)%a |
| Peak120 | 2.7 (0.7)%b | 4.1 (0.6)%a | 3.0 (0.6)%b | 4.5 (0.7)%a |
| Nadir120 | 0.2 (0.5)%c | 0.8 (0.6)%b | 1.0 (0.6)%b | 1.8 (0.7)%a |
| SD120 | 0.9 (0.2)%b | 1.4 (0.2)%a | 1.0 (0.2)%b | 1.5 (0.2)%a |
| GI120* | 59 (19)%b | 86 (27)%a | 77 (19)ab | 93 (24)%a |
Values are mean (SD), except that NAUC120 is median (interquartile range).
1Difference (95% CI) from multinomial logistic regression models. a, b, c, d, used for comparison between groups based on one-way ANOVA test or Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0.05).
*The GI of white rice based on iAUC120.