Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;9:1052943. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1052943

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of included mCRPC patients.

References Country Study design Study period Tumor type Treatment Sample size Age Cutoff value Outcome Follow-up (months) NOS SCORE
Bauckneht et al. (20) Italy RCS 2013–2020 mCRPC [223Ra] RaCl2 + ADT 519 74 (50–90) 768.8 OS 10.7 8
Donate-Moreno et al. (21) Spain PCS Until 2018.12 mCRPC AA/EZ 80 72.7 535 OS 19 [0.43–77.1] 8
Fan et al. (15) China RCS 2013–2017 mCRPC AA-to-DP or DP-to-AA 104 72 [65.3–77.0] 200 OS/PFS 19.2 [17.3–22.3] 8
Lolli et al. (12) Italy RCS 2011.04–2015.05 mCRPC D-to-AA 230 74 (45–90) 535 OS 29 (1–55) 8
Man and Chen (23) China RCS 2010–2018 mCRPC D 179 70 (51–88) 535 OS 24 (2–118) 8
Kobayashi et al. (22) Japan RCS 2008–2018 mCRPC D + ADT 144 71 [65–76] 636 OS/PFS NR 7
Stangl-Kremser et al. (26) Austria RCS 2005–2016 mCRPC D + ADT 186 68.8 [64.6–75.0] 200 OS/PFS 25.5 [12.8–42.4] 8

[ ], interquartile range; ( ), range; AA, abiraterone; ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; D, docetaxel; DP, docetaxel-prednisone; EZ, Enzalutamide; mCRPC, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; NR, Not Reported; OS, overall survival; PCS, prospective cohort study; PFS, progression-free survival; [223Ra] RaCl2, radium-223 dichloride; RCS, retrospective cohort study.

More than 90% of patients included in studies conducted by Kobayashi et al. and Stangl-Kremser et al. were diagnosed with mCRPC and <10% were diagnosed with nmCRPC, so these studies were therefore assigned to the mCRPC group.