Table 1.
GWAS results for all traits.
| P value | By random chance | Red Rot resistance | Tonnes cane per hectare | Commercial cane sugar | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 1R | P | 1R | |||
| ≤ 10-2 | 352 | 714 | 907 | 1083 | 497 | 1037 |
| ≤ 10-3 | 35 | 243 | 184 | 232 | 63 | 134 |
| ≤ 10-4 | 4 | 184 | 42 | 47 | 3 | 23 |
| ≤ 10-5 | 0 | 141 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| ≤ 10-6 | 0 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ≤ 10-7 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ≤ 10-8 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ≤ 10-9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The number of SNPs associated with Red Rot resistance, cane yield (TCH) and commercial cane sugar content (CCS) at different p values is shown, along with the number of SNPs expected to be associated with the trait by random chance (i.e. assuming the null hypothesis of no markers linked to red rot resistance). For TCH and CCS, the crop cycle in which the trait was measured is indicated where P, plant crop; 1R, first ratoon.