Table 3.
Model 1: Gaussian multilevel generalized additive model of cognitive function score.
| Parametric terms: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| parameter | estimate | std. error | t-value |
| Intercept | 0.315 | 0.125 | 2.52 |
| Age at baseline | −0.094 | 0.001 | −76.66 |
| Years from baseline test | −0.075 | 0.002 | −34.05 |
| White | 0.962 | 0.031 | 31.33 |
| Male | −0.344 | 0.023 | −15.24 |
| Education: college degree (ref.) | - | - | - |
| Education: high school degree | −0.900 | 0.024 | −37.08 |
| Education: no formal degree | −1.743 | 0.041 | −42.16 |
| Tract, proportion owner occupied housing | 0.192 | 0.074 | 2.60 |
| Tract, proportion Black | −0.152 | 0.049 | −3.09 |
| Tract, proportion below poverty line | −0.340 | 0.112 | −3.04 |
| Population density (logged) | 0.035 | 0.012 | 3.04 |
| Random terms: | |||
|
| |||
| parameter | std. deviation | ||
| Person-specific intercepts | 1.263 | ||
| Person-specific time slopes | 0.127 | ||
| Tract-specific intercepts | 0.229 | ||
| County-specific intercepts | 0.165 | ||
| Smooth terms: | |||
|
| |||
| parameter | EDF | p-value | |
| Tract, recreation center density | 0.795 | 0.031 | |
| Tract, social organization density | 2.240 | <0.001 | |
| Tract, religious organization density | 0.000 | 1.000 | |
| Tract, fast-food and coffee density | 0.913 | 0.002 | |
| Tract, senior services density | 0.000 | 1.000 | |
| Tract, educational organization density | 0.623 | 0.103 | |
| Tract, arts organization density | 0.813 | 0.025 | |
| Tract, museum density | 0.800 | 0.026 | |
| Tract, library density | 0.000 | 1.000 | |
| Tract, polluting site density | 0.000 | 1.000 | |
| Tract, parks density | 0.000 | 1.000 | |
| Tract, highway density | 0.933 | 0.002 | |
| Tract, grocery store density | 0.025 | 0.311 | |
Note: EDF denotes “effective degrees of freedom” and summarizes the number of parameters associated with each smooth term. Ref. indicates “reference category.”