Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;13:1026012. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1026012

TABLE 2.

Study characteristics—Time to task failure.

Study Participant’s age (n) Fatiguing exercise (criteria for exercise ending) TTF (in s)
Ch Ado Adu Muscle group Ch Ado Adu Statistical significance
ISOMETRIC EXERCISE
Armatas et al. (2010) 10 (13) 26 (13) 5 s MVC/5 s rest (↓ of 50% MVC) KE 563 348 S
Bontemps et al. (2019) 10 (18) 22 (19) 5 s MVC/5 s rest (↓ of 40% MVC) KE 404 159 S
Hatzikotoulas et al. (2014) 11 (10) 26 (11) Sustained MVC (↓ of 50% MVC) PF 127 94 S
Patikas et al. (2013) 10 (14) 24 (14) Sustained 20% MVC (5 s < 95% target force) PF 771 786 NS
Sustained 60% MVC (5 s < 95% target force) 195 201 NS
Piponnier et al. (2020) 10 (19) 22 (23) 5 s MVC/5 s rest optimal length (↓ of 40% MVC) PF 156 135 NS
5 s MVC/5 s rest long length (↓ of 40% MVC) 120 130 NS
5 s MVC/5 s rest short length (↓ of 40% MVC) 170 160 NS
Piponnier et al. (2019b) 10 (22) 21 (22) 5 s MVC/5 s rest optimal length (↓ of 40% MVC) KE 397 148 S
5 s MVC/5 s rest long length (↓ of 40% MVC) 295 158 S
5 s MVC/5 s rest short length (↓ of 40% MVC) 337 409 NS
Piponnier et al. (2019a) 10 (9) 14 (8) 24 (11) 5 s MVC/5 s rest (↓ of 40% MVC) KE 529 426 266 S (Ch & Ado vs. Adu)
Ratel et al. (2015) 10 (11) 24 (12) 5 s MVC/5 s rest (↓ of 40% MVC) KE 495 340 S
Tanina et al. (2017) 9 (14) 25 (14) Sorensen back test (> 2 cm reduction in height for 2 s) TE 95 98 NS
Woods et al. (2019) 10 (18) 24 (21) Intermittent 5 s submaximal contractions (volitional exhaustion) KE 688 632 NS
Woods et al. (2020) 10 (17) 24 (17) Intermittent 5 s submaximal contractions (volitional exhaustion) KE 608 560 NS
DYNAMIC EXERCISE
Bar Yoseph et al. (2019) 11 (18) 17 (18) 29 (8) Incremental cycling exercise (cadence < 60 rpm) LL 670 692 690 NS
Incremental running exercise (volitional exhaustion) 700 951 1,013 S (Ado & Adu vs. Ch)
Berthoin et al. (2003) 11 (9) 22 (8) Cycling at 120% PMA (volitional exhaustion) LL 53 122 S
Leclair et al. (2011) 10 (15) 24 (15) Constant load cycling exercise P50 (cadence < 70 rpm) LL 702 754 NS
Constant load cycling exercise P75 (cadence < 70 rpm) 307 371
Constant load cycling exercise P100 (cadence < 70 rpm) 144 221 S
Constant load cycling exercise P110 (cadence < 70 rpm) 96 147 S
Murphy et al. (2014) 10 (10) 26 (10) 3 × max CON MVC Low RM (volitional exhaustion) KE 274 253 S
3 × max CON MVC High RM (volitional exhaustion) 213 193
Pullinen et al. (2011) 14 (8) 31 (8) 3 × max contractions at 40% RM (volitional exhaustion) KE 48 48 NS
Pullinen et al. (2002) 14 (6) 27 (6) 1 × max contractions at 40% RM (volitional exhaustion) KE 46 42 NS
Tibana et al. (2012) 15 (15) 22 (15) 3 × max chest press w/30 s rest (volitional exhaustion) UL 96 88 S
3 × max chest press w/60 s rest (volitional exhaustion) 163 156 S
3 × max chest press w/120 s rest (volitional exhaustion) 292 282 S

Data presented in bold black were directly given in time units (seconds) in the article. Data presented in bold blue were calculated by the authors from the number of contractions performed during the fatiguing exercise. Ado, adolescents; Adu, adult; Ch, children; CON, concentric; KE, knee extensors; KF, knee flexors; LL, lower limbs; MVC, maximal voluntary contraction; n, number of participants; NS, nonsignificant; P50 and P75, intensities corresponded to 50 and 75% of the difference between maximal aerobic power and the power associated with the ventilatory threshold; P100 and P110, intensities corresponded to 100 and 110% of maximal aerobic power; PF, plantar flexors; RM, maximum repetition; S, statistically significant (i.e., p < 0.05); TE, trunk extensors; TTF, time to task failure; UL, upper limbs.