Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;66:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.10.018

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of factors affecting PFS.

Factors PFS (months) HR 95% CI p
Age
 <50 (n = 21) 2 0.75 0.39–1.42 0.372
 ≥50 (n = 23) 2.1
Endocrine partner
 Anti-estrogens (n = 5) 2 0.94 0.69–1.28 0.679
 Letrozole or anastrozole (n = 8) 2.1
 Exemestane (n = 19) 1.9
 Fulvestrant (n-10) 2
 Medroxyprogesterone (n = 2) 2
Liver metastasis
 No (n = 19) 2 1.11 0.60–2.06 0.732
 Yes (n = 25) 2
Lung metastasis
 No (n = 20) 2 1.03 0.56–1.91 0.916
 Yes (n = 24) 2
Visceral metastasis
 No (n = 10) 1.9 0.81 0.38–1.71 0.583
 Yes (n = 34) 2
Number of metastatic sites
 1 (n = 6) 4.1 2.79 1.09–7.92 0.035
 ≥2 (n = 38) 2
Chemotherapy lines for MBC
 ≤2 (n = 25) 2.1 1.99 1.03–3.84 0.039
 ≥3 (n = 19) 2
Menopausal status
 Premenopausal (n = 21) 2 0.99 0.54–1.83 0.981
 Postmenopausal (n = 23) 2
Endocrine sensitivity
 No (n = 5) 1.8 0.39 0.15–1.04 0.061
 Yes (n = 39) 2.1
Benefits of CDK4/6i
 No benefits (n = 17) 2 0.66 0.35–1.23 0.187
 Benefits (n = 27) 2.1
DFS
 ≤24 months (n = 21) 2 0.78 0.42–1.44 0.426
 >24 months (n = 23) 2.1
Number of therapy between tucidinostat and CDK4/6i
 0 (n = 7) 4.5 3.96 1.48–10.61 0.006
 ≥1 (n = 37) 2
Number of tucidinostat treatment
 ≤3 (n = 7) 4.5 2.55 1.08–6.62 0.037
 ≥3 (n = 37) 2