Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 13;107(4 Suppl):107–117. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1344

Table 1.

Details of data collected in the MESA-ICEMR study sites

Study Data collected MESA sites Clinical impact and translational value
Themes AVBRH GMC KGVK RMRC-NE
Source of data a) Routine health information system
b) Household-based surveys
1. Malaria knowledge 1.1 Proportion of population at risk who know the main symptom of malaria 1.a Community engagement
1.2 Proportion of population at risk who know the treatment of malaria 1.b Community awareness
1.3 Proportion of population at risk who know preventive measures for malaria 1.c Receptiveness to malaria control measures
2. Vector control 2.1 Number of surveyed subjects sleeping under an ITN or living in house sprayed by IRS in the previous 12 months 2.a Reduction in number of infective bites
2.2 Number of surveyed subjects who slept under an ITN the previous night 2.b Reduction in vector habitats
3. Diagnostic testing 3.1 Total number of febrile cases who received a parasitological test for malaria (Annual Blood Examination Rate) 3.a Screening capacity in health facilities
3.2 Improved light microscopy tool for counting low parasitemia P. vivax infections 3.b Treatment seeking pattern of infected individuals
3.c Sensitivity of diagnosis and surveillance
4. Surveillance 4.1 Confirmed malaria cases species wise per 1,000 population at risk 4.a Transmission reservoir, intensity, species distribution
4.2 Number of severe cases species wise 4.b Burden of severe cases and species responsible for it
4.3 Demography—age, gender, and occupation 4.c Age, gender occupation as risk factor for infection
4.4 Travel history 4.d Proportion of imported cases
4.5 Distribution of cases during different seasons 4.e Seasonality of cases
4.6 Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of transmission 4.f Stratifying malaria cases
4.7 Proportion of low density and asymptomatic infections 4.g Role of submicroscopic and asymptomatic infections in transmission
4.8 Genotype of parasites from different study sites 4.h Genetic diversity of parasite populations in different regions
5. Treatment 5.1 Proportion of patients with confirmed malaria who received first-line antimalarial treatment according to national policy
  • 5.a Heterogenous treatment regimen in India

  • 5.b Transmission-blocking efforts

5.2 Proportion of patients with P. vivax malaria who received radical cure treatment with primaquine 5.c Percentage of referred cases from primary healthcare to tertiary health care facility because of severity
5.3 Proportion of confirmed P. falciparum cases who received single, low-dose primaquine 5.d Artemisinin resistance status
5.4 Proportion of severe malaria cases that were referred
5.5 Proportion of referred patients with severe malaria that received prereferral treatment
5.6 Proportion of ACT resistant infections (in vitro)
6. Vector studies 6.1 Geographic and seasonal distribution of Anopheles species specific to a site 6.a Tailor made control measures depending on vector
6.2 Time (early/late), place (indoor/ outdoor), and host choice (humans/animals) for biting 6.b species 6.c distribution (geographic and seasonal)
6.3 Insecticide resistance status 6.d biting preferences
6.4 Morphotaxonomic classification of vectors and sibling species analysis 6.e vector sensitivity to insecticides used for spraying
6.5 Sporozoite positivity rate 6.f entomological transmission metric
7. Pathogenesis 7.1 Role of invasion ligand/host-receptor interaction 7.a Variation in usage of invasion ligands and their association with disease severity
7.2 Role of var gene expression in P. falciparum pathogenesis 7.b Potential marker of shift from non lethal to lethal form
7.3 Host cell preference for P.vivax infection
7.4 Short-term P. vivax culture system 7.c Drug and invasion assays for P. vivax
7.5 Multiplicity of infection 7.d Diversity of infection
8. Host Response 8.1 Seroreactivity and antibody response against parasite proteins 8.a Biomarkers of population wide-NAI
8.2 Differential seroreactivity to P. falciparum antigens in severe and nonsevere cohorts 8.b Variation in immunity
9. Drug resistance 9.1 Monitoring polymorphisms related to drug resistance in the study sites 9.a Surveillance of region-specific drug resistance markers
9.2 Monitoring antimalarial drug sensitivity in vitro 9.b Surveillance of region-specific antimalarial sensitivity
9.3 Mechanisms of acquiring resistance by parasites against currently used antimalarials and drugs in development 9.c Strategies to avoid drug resistance
10. Impact of control measures
10A. Prevalence 10A.1 Parasite prevalence: proportion of population with evidence of infection with malaria parasites 10.a Changes in transmission reservoir and intensity
10B. Incidence 10B.1 Number and rate of confirmed malaria cases per 1,000 people per year 10.b Effectiveness of malaria control regimen in the study sites to curb morbidity and mortality
10B.2 Number of malaria inpatients
10B.3 Malaria test positivity rate
10C. Mortality 10C.1 Number and rate of malaria deaths per 100,000 people per year
10C.2 Proportion of inpatient deaths due to malaria

The clinical and translational value of this data is outlined in the context of malaria control and elimination in India. AVBRH = Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Wardha; GMC = Goa Medical College, Goa; KGVK = Krishi Gram Vikas Kendra, Ranchi; NAI = Naturally Acquired Immunity; RMRC-NE = Regional Medical Research Center-Northeast, Dibrugarh.