Zanarini 2004.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | 8‐week trial with 3 arms:
Duration: 8 weeks Country: USA Setting: outpatient |
|
Participants |
Method of recruitment of participants: "Recruitment [...] was accomplished primarily through advertisement in Boston, Mass. area newspapers." (Zanarini 2004, p. 904) Overall sample size: 45 Diagnosis of borderline personality disorder: DSM‐IV Means of assessment: DIB‐R Mean age: 23 years (SD 5.7; range = no information) Sex: 100% women Comorbidity: Current major depression, current or lifetime schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder were exclusion criteria. In terms of Axis I disorders, 93.3% had a history of a mood disorder, 51.1% had a history of a substance use disorder, 48.9% had a history of an anxiety disorder and 44.4% had a history of an eating disorder. Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Experimental group
Treatment name: fluoxetine
Number randomised to group: 14
Duration: 8 weeks Comparison group 1 Treatment name: olanzapine Number randomised to group: 16 Duration: 8 weeks Comparison group 2 Treatment name: fluoxetine + olanzapine Number randomised to group: 15 Duration: 8 weeks All groups Concomitant psychotherapy: not specified Concomitant pharmacotherapy: Current prescription to any psychotropic medication was an exclusion criterion. No other information provided Proportions of participants taking standing medication during trial observation period: no information |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes: none Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes |
Sample calculation: no information Ethics approval: yes Funding source: funded or partially funded by pharmaceutical industry Comments from trial authors (limitations)
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information on methods used to generate random sequence to permit a judgement of low or high risk of bias |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement of high or low risk of bias |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Dose was adjusted by an unblinded psychiatrist according to perceived response and side effects. Both subjects and raters were blinded to study assignment. The blind was broken after acquisition of all endpoint data for all subjects." (Zanarini 2004, p. 904) |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Dose was adjusted by an unblinded psychiatrist according to perceived response and side effects. Both subjects and raters were blinded to study assignment. The blind was broken after acquisition of all endpoint data for all subjects." (Zanarini 2004, p. 904) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk |
Comments: Reasons for dropout specified (Zanarini 2004 p. 905), but outcome data were only reported for completers. Of the 45 patients enrolled, 42 completed treatment (13 in fluoxetine group, 16 in olanzapine group, 13 in fluoxetine + olanzapine group) Reasons for early termination: Onset of a number of psychosocial stressors culminating in a suicide gesture: 1/0/0 Dizziness and headaches: 0/0/1 Lost to follow‐up: 0/0/1 |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no protocol found |
Vested Interest (funding and/or author affiliations) | High risk | Quote: "Supported by a grant from Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Ind." (Zanarini 2004, p. 903) |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no apparent other sources of bias found |