Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;14(1):77–92. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01328-7

Table 3.

Changes in estimated mean levels of continuous endpoints during follow-up and within-group comparisons (T6 versus T0) (EP and PP populations)

Population Outcome Visit Estimated mean and 95% CI Estimated mean difference from T0 and 95% CI Within group
p-value*
EP FBG (mg/dL) T0 175.3 (165.6, 185.1)
T6 157.6 (149.0, 166.2) −17.7 (−28.3, −7.2) 0.001
Body weight (kg) T0 83.44 (80.93, 85.95)
T6 82.96 (80.48, 85.44) −0.48 (−1.11, 0.15) 0.14
iGlarLixi dose (IU) T0 18.73 (17.58, 19.88)
T6 23.86 (22.41, 25.31) 5.14 (3.95, 6.33) < 0.0001
PP FBG (mg/dL) T0 177.05 (163.83, 190.27)
T6 148.6 (140.7, 156.5) −28.4 (−41.2, −15.7) <0.0001
Body weight (kg) T0 83.27 (79.94, 86.60)
T6 82.06 (78.79, 85.33) −1.21 (−1.95, −0.47) 0.002
iGlarLixi dose (IU) T0 17.73 (16.49, 18.97)
T6 22.12 (20.35, 23.89) 4.40 (3.18, 5.62) <0.0001

*Paired t-test derived from linear mixed models for repeated measurements. Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) are in bold

EP efficacy population: subset of the intention-to-treat population (ITT) having HbA1c valid values at T0 and T6, PP per-protocol population: subset of EP patients treated according to summary of product characteristics