Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;6(8):e12831. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12831

TABLE 4.

Patient and clinician survey results

Question Patients (n = 11) Clinicians (n = 22)
Language in decision aid, n (%)
Appropriate 9 (82) 19 (86)
Difficult to read 2 (18) 1 (4)
Neutral 2 (9)
Amount of Information provided, n (%)
About right 6 (54) 10 (45)
More than desired 3 (27) 10 (45)
Less than desired 2 (18) 2 (9)
Length of decision aid, n (%)
Appropriate 9 (82) 12 (55)
Too long 2 (18) 10 (45)
Harms and benefits included, n (%)
Well‐balanced 82% (9) 17 (80) a
Biased toward taking LMWH 18% (2) 4 (20)
Overall quality of decision aid, n (%)
Satisfied 73% (8) 19 (86)
Not satisfied 27% (3) 1 (4)
Neutral 2 (9)
Benefits and harms easy to follow, n (%)
Agree 9 (82) N/A
Disagree 2 (18)
PtDA would be helpful during decision making, n (%)
Helpful 9 (82) N/A
Neutral 1 (9)
Not helpful 1 (9)
Would recommend this tool for future patients, n (%)
Yes 9 (82) N/A
No 2 (18)
Agree with benefits and harms reported, n (%)
Agree N/A 19 (86)
Disagree 1 (4)
Neutral 1 (4)
Believed this is a useful tool for counseling, n (%)
Yes N/A 18 (82)
No 3 (14)
Neutral 1 (4)
Anticipate using PtDA in practice (n, %)
Agree N/A 10 (45)
Disagree 4 (18)
Neutral 8 (36)

Abbreviations: N/A, not applicable; PtDA, patient decision aid.

a

n = 21.