Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 2;51(8):3765–3789. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02375-8

Table 2.

Coefficients of the multiple regression models (full models) predicting the SDI-2 scores

SDI-2 score
Predictor Total Dyadic-P Dyadic-A Solitary
Age .10** .11***  − .00 .09**
Gender/sex –.31*** –.07  − .46***  − .28***
Sexual orientation .31*** .15 .13 .42***
Masculinity a .18*** .21*** .17*** .06
Relationship status .13*** .33***  − .16***  − .11**
Health a  − .03 .02  − .03  − .08***
Attractiveness a .08* .06 .04 .07*
Age × relationship status  − .09*  − .16*** .02 .01
Gender/sex × Attractivenessa .07 .08* .04 .03
Gender/sex × Masculinitya  − .13**  − .21***  − .14** .04
Gender/sex × Sex. orientation  − .15  − .21*  − .03  − .03
Adj. R2 .081 .071 .090 .078

SDI-2 = Sexual Desire Inventory-2 (Spector et al., 1996); dyadic-P = dyadic (partner); dyadic-A = dyadic (attractive person). Multiple regression models (full models) are each based on N = 2744 observations. Participant gender/sex, relationship status, and sexual orientation were factor coded (0 = male, 1 = female; 0 = heterosexual, 1 = same-sex attracted; 0 = single, 1 = in a committed relationship). All continuous variables were z-standardized. Negative estimates indicate lower scores for women compared to men, for same-sex attracted compared to heterosexual people, and for people having a partner compared to singles. aSelf-rated. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001