Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 27;51(8):3871–3886. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02357-w

Table 2.

Model with contemporaneous time-varying predictors and person-level predictors of momentary sexual motivation

Predictors Estimate SE 95% Confidence interval p value

Fixed effects

Intercept

1.21 0.56 0.10 to 2.31 .031
Negative affecta −0.47 0.40 −1.27 to 0.33 .24
Positive affecta 0.08 0.32 −0.56 to 0.40 .79
Age −0.01 0.01 −0.01 to 0.02 .41
Gender (female = 0; male = 1) 0.30 0.13 0.04 to 0.57 .027
Relationship duration −0.01 0.01 −0.03 to 0.00 .12
Depressive symptoms −0.02 0.01 −0.05 to 0.01 .22
Anxiety 0.02 0.03 −0.03 to 0.07 .43
Sexual frequency 0.14 0.03 0.08 to 0.20  < .001
SES 0.07 0.02 0.03 to 0.11  < .001
SIS1 −0.01 0.03 −0.08 to 0.06 .83
SIS2 −0.06 0.03 −0.12 to −0.00 .042
Negative affect*SES 0.03 0.02 0.00 to 0.06 .047
Negative affect*SIS1 −0.02 0.02 −0.07 to 0.03 .40
Negative affect*SIS2 0.02 0.02 −0.03 to 0.06 ..42
Positive affect*SES 0.03 0.01 0.01 to 0.05 .016
Positive affect*SIS1 −0.00 0.02 −0.04 to 0.04 .91
Positive affect*SIS2 −0.00 0.02 −0.04 to 0.03 .82
Positive affect * Negative affect −0.18 0.04 −0.25 to −0.11  < .001

Random effects

Residual variance

0.818
Random intercepts (variance in subject means of sexual motivation) 0.462
Random slopes (positive affect) 0.141
Random slopes (negative affect) 0.068
ICC empty model 0.480
Number of subjects/number of observations used 129/6866

Bold values are statistically significant (p < .05)

aTo assess the cross-level interactions between person-level variables and the time-varying variables with least amount of bias, the latter were person mean centered (Hamaker & Grasman, 2015)