Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;12:19537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23956-6

Table 2.

Optimization of the reaction conditions in the typical reaction.a

graphic file with name 41598_2022_23956_Figa_HTML.gif
Entry Solvent Catalyst loading (g) Temperature (°C) Time (min) Yield (%)b
1 CH3CN 0.01 Reflux 60 51
2 EtOAc 0.01 Reflux 90 Trace
3 n-hexane 0.01 Reflux 120  − 
4 C2H5OH 0.01 Reflux 45 70
5 H2O 0.01 Reflux 60 66
6  −  0.01 100 10 85
7  −   −  100 60  − 
8  −  0.01 25 90  − 
9  −  0.01 50 60 65
10  −  0.01 75 30 76
11  −  0.005 100 60 72
12  −  0.02 100 15 85
13  −  0.03 100 20 85
14c  −  0.01 100 60 35
15d  −  0.01 100 60 54
16e  −  0.01 100 30 61
17f  −  0.01 100 10 85
18g  −  0.01 100 30 83
19h  −  0.01 100 15 80

aReaction conditions: 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (1 mmol; 0.166 g), 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (1 mmol; 0.084 g, 0.014 mL), malononitrile (1 mmol; 0.066 g); bIsolated yield; cCompound A (in Fig. 3) was used as a catalyst; dCompound B (in Fig. 3) was used as a catalyst; eCompound C (in Fig. 3) was used as a catalyst; f{[VO(TPPA)][C(CN)3]4}72 was used as a catalyst; gChitosan based vanadium oxo (ChVO)75 was used as a catalyst; h[VO(TPPABr)]CBr376 was used as a catalyst.