Aldayel et al. [2] |
DEAP dataset, power spectral density and asymmetry |
Preference ratings |
DNN, KNN, SVM, RF |
0.94, 0.88, 0.62, 0.92 |
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041525 |
Aldayel et al. [3] |
DEAP dataset, power spectral density |
Preference ratings |
KNN, SVM, RF, DNN |
0.73, 0.81, 0.87, 0.83 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.604639 |
Al-Nafjan [6] |
PCA, mRMR, RFE, ReliefF feature selection algorithms |
Like/Dislike self-report responses to Commercial products |
DNN, SVM, KNN, LDA, RF |
0.93, 0.81, 0.78, 0.70, 0.82 |
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.944 |
Alimardani and Kaba [4] |
Raw EEG signal |
Product Choices and movie ratings |
CNN, Ensemble Model |
0.51–0.75, 0.51–0.64 |
https://doi.org/10.1145/3460881.3460930 |
Bandara et al. [23] |
PCA feature selection from power spectral density |
Movie trailer preference |
RF, SVC |
91.97, 91.70 |
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIS53135.2021.9660742 |
Barnett and Cerf [24] |
EEG cross-brain correlation |
Product willingness to pay |
Linear Regression |
0.66 |
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw083 |
Bhushan et al. [31] |
TF synchronisation |
Binary preference |
ANN |
74.3 |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043351 |
Gauba et al. [85] |
EEG TF effects |
Video advertisement preference |
RF, DT, Linear regression |
0.68, 0.33, 0.041 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2017.01.013 |
Adrián et al. [1] |
HR, GSR and EEG TF effects |
Video advertisement Valence score |
Logistic Regression, SVM, RF |
0.66, 0.67, 0.89 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2016.00074 |
Golnar-Nik et al. [87] |
EEG power |
Like/dislike ratings |
SVM, LDA |
0.87, 0.90 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.04.025 |
Guo and Elgendi [101] |
TF effects, prepurchase ratings |
E-commerce purchase behaviour |
Recommender system |
N/A |
https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.1.1.61–65 |
Guo et al. [98] |
ET, and TF power |
Aesthetic preference |
SVM, KNN, RF, XGBoost |
0.54, 0.61, 0.59. 0.56 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.02.006 |
Guixeres et al. [96] |
EEG, HRV, ET |
Youtube advertisement like/dislike and recall scores |
ANN |
0.83 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01808 |
Hakim et al. [102] |
Frontal band power, hemispheric asymmetry, inter-subject correlations |
Product preference |
SVM, Logistic regression, DT, KNN, |
0.69, 0.67, 0.63, 0.60 |
https://doi.org/10.1101/317073 |
Hakim et al. [103] |
Frontal band power, hemispheric asymmetry, inter-subject correlations |
Product Preference |
SVM, Logisitic Regression, KNN, TREE |
0.69, 0.67, 0.63, 0.60 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.005 |
Khushaba et al. [139] |
Eye-tracking fixation and time–frequency effects |
Product preference |
Logistic Regression |
N/A |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.095 |
Kumar et al. [151] |
Raw EEG signal |
Product valence scores |
RF |
0.74 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.001 |
Pandey et al. [206] |
Discrete Wavelet Transform power and entropy for 5 frequency bands |
Movie trailer Likert ratings (rating, familiarity, purchase intent, willingness to spend) |
KNN, RF, MP |
0.72, 0.71, 0.67 |
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.10756 |
Phutela et al. [210] |
Wavelet coefficient, power spectral density, and Hjorth parameters |
Advertisement and product preference |
NB, SVM, KNN, DT, DL |
0.66, 0.66, 0.55, 0.54, 0.55 |
https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07484 |
Ma et al. [178] |
ERP |
Brand extension acceptance rates |
T-SNE algorithm |
0.87 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.610890 |
Mashrur et al. [185] |
Frequency, time, and time–frequency metrics over frontal electrodes |
Purchase intention and affective attitude towards advertisements |
SVM |
0.84 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.861270 |
Mashrur et al. [186] |
Frequency, time, and time–frequency metrics over frontal electrodes |
Affective attitude towards E-commerce products |
SVM |
0.94 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113847 |
Roberts et al. [223] |
ERP and eye-movements |
Product willingness to pay |
Independent component analysis |
N/A |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00910 |
Shestyuk et al. [237] |
Frontal asymmetry (alpha/beta), fronto-central power (alpha/theta + theta/gamma) |
TV viewership and twitter activity |
Linear regression, multiple regression |
0.63, 0.72 |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214507 |
Soria Morillo et al. [254] |
Frequency band power |
Advertisement like/dislike ratings |
ANN |
0.75 |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016–0181-2 |
Soria Morillo et al. [255] |
Frequency band power |
Advertisement like/dislike ratings |
ANN |
0.82 |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–16,480-9_68 |
Slanzi et al. [251] |
Gaze position, pupil dilation, and EEG TF |
Website click choice |
SVC, logistic regression, neural network |
0.69, 0.71, 0.62 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.09.003 |
Tyson-Carr et al. [262] |
ERP and eye-movements |
Product willingness to pay |
Independent component analysis |
N/A |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116213 |
Ullah et al. [263] |
Wavelet transformed EEG data |
E-commerce product like/dislike ratings |
SVM, DT, KNN, ANN |
0.80, 0.68, 0.76, 0.81 |
https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130137 |
Wang et al. [287] |
EEG and ET data |
Self-reported preference |
PCA, Random Lasso, SVM |
0.80, 0.75,0.92 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101095 |
Wei et al., [291] |
EEF TF data |
Advertisement effectiveness |
SVM |
0.75 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00076 |
Yadava et al. [294] |
EEG TF effects |
Like/dislike ratings of e-commerce products |
HMM |
0.68 |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017–4580-6 |
Yılmaz et al. [303] |
Power spectral density |
Product like/dislike ratings |
Logistic regression |
N/A |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.11.010 |
Zamani and Naieni [307] |
Band power over five brain lobes |
Like/dislike ratings of E-commerce products |
SVM, ANN, RF |
0.87, 0.70, 0.81 |
https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v7i3.4621 |
Zeng et al. [308] |
Power spectral density, hemispheric asymmetry, differential entropy, Hjorth parameters |
Sport shoes like/dislike ratings |
KNN, SVM |
0.94, 0.8 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.793952 |
Zheng et al. [313] |
PSD |
Emotion classification |
DNN |
0.85 |
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2018.2797176 |
Zhu et al. [314] |
EEG and ET mixed measures |
Self-reported preference |
SVM, RF, CNN |
70.26, 72.15, 96.4 |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101601 |