Table 5.
Comparison of applied optimized parameters in the form of photovoltaic parameters.
| Steps | VOC (V) | JSC (mA/cm2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applying resistances + reflection + radiative recombination + Auger recombination | 0.84 | 18.34 | 54.25 | 8.40 |
| Applying the optimum absorber thickness | 0.85 | 17.85 | 55.30 | 8.36 |
| Applying the optimum ETM thickness | 0.85 | 18.21 | 62.03 | 9.61 |
| Applying the optimum HTM thickness | 0.85 | 18.22 | 62.67 | 9.71 |
| Applying the optimum absorber doping density | 0.87 | 18.60 | 75.97 | 12.28 |
| Applying the optimum ETM doping density | 0.87 | 18.58 | 78.89 | 12.79 |
| Applying the optimum HTM doping density (Final step) | 0.87 | 18.58 | 79.15 | 12.83 |
| Experimental [40] | 0.974 | 23.01 | 0.56 | 12.72 |