Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;71(12):2430–2438. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327293

Table 2.

Analysis of study period responders in double-blind phase (ITT population): the table shows responder rates for composite (primary outcome) and individual stool consistency and abdominal pain

Study period responder Placebo Enterosgel OR (95% CI)* P value
Primary outcome
 Observed data (excluding weeks with <4 values) 52/214 (24.3) 80/214 (37.4) 1.95 (1.28 to 2.99) 0.0020
 Observed data (excluding weeks with <7 values) 37/206 (18.0) 61/204 (29.9) 2.03 (1.26 to 3.25) 0.0035
Stool consistency
 Observed data (excluding weeks with <4 values) 91/214 (42.5) 125/214 (58.4) 1.97 (1.33 to 2.92) 0.0007
 Observed data (excluding weeks with <7 values) 67/206 (32.5) 99/204 (48.5) 2.02 (1.34 to 3.05) 0.0007
Abdominal pain
 Observed data (excluding weeks with <4 values) 86/214 (40.2) 114/214 (53.3) 1.80 (1.22 to 2.67) 0.0034
 Observed data (excluding) 70/206 (34.0) 94/204 (46.10) 1.76 (1.16 to 2.65) 0.0074

Data are reported as number of patients, proportion (%), and OR (95% CI).

*Adjusted for age and sex.