Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;20(11):e07634. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7634
Parent Aerobic conditions
Soil type (indicate if bare or cropped soil was use/d) Study – Soil pH(CaCl2) Org. C (%) DT50 (day) DT90 (day) Kinetic parameters St. (χ2) (a) Fast DT50 (dnorm) 20°C/pF2 Slow DT50 (dnorm) 20°C/pF2 Method of calculation (a)
Loamy sand (bare soil) 1999/11287‐ALO/03/98 7.5 0.7

2.4

526.5

k1: 0.2914

k2: 0.00273

tb: 3.005

5.2/

(b)

HS/

Sandy loam (bare soil) 1999/11287 ‐ ALO/04/98 7.6 0.9 5.4 793.7

k1: 0.1287

k2:0.00186

tb: 6.527

9.2/

(b)

HS/

Loamy sand (bare soil) 1999/11287 ‐HUS/09/98 5.8 1.3 91.5 > 1000

k1: 0.00758

k2: 2.3 E‐14

tb: 118.6

8.8/12.5 79.8 HS/SFO
Loamy sand (bare soil) 2000/1000122 ‐ D05/03/97 6.3 1.08 29.3 > 1000 k1: 0.05682 k2: 0.00029 g: 0.613 1.9/5.9 8.3 (c) 346.2 (d) DFOP/HS
Loamy sand (bare soil) 2000/1000122 ‐ DU3/04/97 5.3 0.63 63.0 > 1000

k1: 0.01428

k2: 3.07 E‐13

g: 0.843

4.8/7.5 62.0 DFOP/SFO
Silty clay loam (bare soil) 2000/1000122 ‐ DU2/03/97 6.4 1.29 25.1 > 1,000 k1: 0.04073 k2: 0.000619 g: 0.776 6.7/7.0 6.5 (c) 158.7 (d) DFOP/DFOP
Loam (bare soil, sand cover) 2014/1289366 ‐ 01 (ES) 7.3 0.93 18.5 (f) 611.7 (f)

k1: 0.03753 (f)

k2: 0.00178 (f)

tb: 3.4 (f)

25.2/33.0 101.9 (e) HS/FOMC
Sandy loam (bare soil, sand cover) 2014/1289366 ‐ 02 (IT) 7.6 0.45 36.7 (f) 946.6 (f)

k1: 0.04145 (f)

k2: 0.001424 (f)

g: 0.615 (f)

6.0/6.3 15.3 (c) 279.7 (d) DFOP/DFOP
Silt loam (bare soil, sand cover) 2014/1289366 ‐ 03 (UK) 6.6 1.64 62.7 (f) 625.1 (f)

k1: 1458 (f)

k2: 0.008903 (f)

g: 0.241 (f)

15.2/15.8 65.6 DFOP/SFO
Sandy loam (bare soil, sand cover) 2014/1289366 ‐ 04 (DE) 5.9 2.07 184.7 (f) > 1,000 (f)

k1: 0.02567 (f)

k2: 0.001548 (f) g: 0.339 (f)

4.5/6.6 126.6 DFOP/SFO
Silt loam (bare soil, sand cover) 2014/1289366 ‐ 05 (FR) 4.9 0.81 14.0 (f) 283.2 (f)

k1: 0.09157 (f)

k2: 0.00427 (f)

g: 0.665 (f)

4.5/9.9 47.4 (e) DFOP/FOMC
Geometric mean (if not pH dependent) 38.0 (n = 9) 113.2 (n = 9)
pH dependence No
(a)

First value applies to trigger DT50, second value applies to modelling DT50.

(b)

No normalised DT50 derived due to experimental conditions not suitable for normalisation.

(c)

DegT50 calculated from fast rate (ln2/k1)

(d)

DegT50 calculated from slow rate (ln2/k1).

(e)

DegT50 was calculated as DT90/3.32.

(f)

Best‐fit endpoints should not be used as triggers for additional work due to exclusion of surface loss processes.