Table 1.
Summary of demographic, pathophysiological, diagnostic and therapeutic differences between HFrEF and HFpEF
Characteristics | HFpEF | HFrEF | |
---|---|---|---|
Demographics | Older age, female predominance | Younger age, male predominance | |
Risk factors | Ageing, hypertension, obesity, physical inactivity | Ischaemic heart disease, smoking | |
Pathophysiology | Coronary microvascular inflammation | Direct cardiomyocyte injury and loss | |
Natriuretic peptides | Lower levels | Higher levels | |
LV morphology and other properties | LVEF | ≥50% | <50% |
LV remodelling | Concentric remodelling | Eccentric remodelling | |
LV volumes | Normal | Increased | |
Systolic dysfunction (other than EF) | + | ++ | |
Diastolic dysfunction | ++ | + | |
Aortic stiffness | ++ | + | |
Disturbance of LV relaxation or compliance | ++ | + | |
Response to HF therapy | ACEia | − | ++ |
ARBa | − | ++ | |
SGLT2 inhibitorsb | ++ | ++ | |
ARNI | − | ++ | |
Bteablockers | − | ++ | |
MRA | + | ++ | |
Cause of death | Predominantly non-CV death | Predominantly CV death |
aTrials have not demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit in HFrEF but ARBs/ACEis have proven long-term benefits in the progression of CKD.
bLower risk of HF hospitalization in HFpEF.