Table 10.
Represent the changes in ranking using sensitivity analysis.
| Sub-CSF | Normalized Ranking | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | Scenario 6 | Scenario 7 | Scenario 8 | Scenario 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEC1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TEC2 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| TEC3 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| TEC4 | 13 | 21 | 19 | 17 | 14 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| TEC5 | 5 | 15 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| ORG1 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| ORG2 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
| ORG3 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| ORG4 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| ORG5 | 21 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 |
| ORG6 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
| ORG7 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 |
| INT1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| INT2 | 17 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| INT3 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| INT4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| INT5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| HUM1 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| HUM2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| HUM3 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 19 |
| HUM4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| HUM5 | 15 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |