Table 3. Explored area model summaries.
| A. femoralis 200 m loge (explored area) | D. tinctorius 200 m loge (explored area) | O. sylvatica 200 m loge (explored area) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | Estimates (CI) | p | Estimates (CI) | p | Estimates (CI) | p |
| (Intercept) | 28.0 (8.7 to 47.4) |
0.006 | 5.6 (−7.65 to 18.9) |
0.39 | 30.85 (−97.0 to 158.7) |
0.61 |
| Sex [male] | 1.5 (0.9 to 2.1) |
<0.001 | 1.5 (0.8 to 2.2) |
<0.001 | 0.8 (0.02 to 1.7) |
0.045 |
| Temp. | −1.0 (−1.8 to 0.2) |
0.017 | −0.04 (−0.6 to 0.5) |
0.87 | −0.9 (−6.4 to 4.5) |
0.72 |
| Weight | 1.0 (−0.5 to 2.5) |
0.19 | 0.6 (0.2 to 0.9) |
0.004 | −1.4 (−3.2 to 0.3) |
0.10 |
| Observations | 30 | 32 | 15 | |||
| R2/R2 adjusted | 0.56/0.51 | 0.41/0.35 | 0.38/0.21 | |||
Summary of three linear models with loge-transformed explored area in A. femoralis, D. tinctorius, and O. sylvatica as the response variable, sex as the predictor, and average daytime temperature (Temp.) and frog weight as covariates. Statistical significance with p < 0.05 is highlighted in bold.