Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Jan 7;63(6):748–754. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14802

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Coding of consensus-building discussions. (a) Frequencies of individual codes (total of 54 individual codes with the top 20 codes indicated). There was a natural inflection point in the frequency distribution following the first seven codes. (b) Frequencies of top codes separated by discussant voting category. Codes were used at significantly different frequencies by discussants depending on how they voted about the presence or absence of dystonia in a video (χ2, p=0.004).