Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 9;31(11):1655–1670. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01748-z

Table 3.

Summary of methods and results of the studies included

Author, year Type of evaluation Analysis perspective Health outcomes reported (instruments) Costs included Results (US$, 2020)a Quality
ADHD
 Tran et al. [40] CEA Modified societal ADHD-I cases resolved based on parent and teacher completed CSI Intervention costs (clinician time to run interventions, coordination time and supplies, teacher time); TAU: other healthcare costs (medication, psychotherapy from community providers), childcare, parents' time attending meetings and helping children with homework Both PFT and CLAS had significantly less ADHD-I cases resolved than TAU. PFT had the lowest cost per patient (ICERs per ADHD-I cases resolved: $4,672 for CLAS versus TAU, $3,772 for PFT versus TAU, and $5,838 for CLAS versus PFT). Moderate
 Sonuga-Barke et al. [32] CMA Societal SNAP-IV mean scores Health care services (health clinics, health visitors, GPs, pediatric and mental health services); extra educational provision (school nurses, educational psychologist); social services and parental time off work No differences between NFPP, IY and TAU with regards clinical effectiveness. Individually delivered NFPP was less costly to deliver than IY. No costs estimated for TAU Good
 Zimovetz et al. [33] CUA NHS QALY (EQ5D) Health care costs (GP, psychiatrist, pediatrician, nurse, blood work and other exams) and drug costs From the perspective of the UK NHS, LDX provides a cost-effective treatment option for children and adolescents who are inadequate responders to methylphenidate (ICER = $3,017/QALY at a WTP of $33,485/QALY) Good
 Sohn et al. [34] CUA Third party payer QALY (PedsQL) Health care costs (hospitalizations, emergency room visits, outpatient visits), prescription drug costs AAPs were less effective and more costly than clonidine/guanfacine and atomoxetine Good
 Maia et al. [35] CUA Public health system QALY (HUI) Treatment costs (drug and outpatient) IR-MPH treatment of children and adolescents is cost-effective for ADHD patients from the Brazilian public health system perspective. ICER = $10,070/QALY (children); $13,145/QALY (adolescents) at a WTP of $38,264/QALY Good
 Lachaine, et al. [36] CUA Societal QALY (TTO and VAS) Health care services (primary care, mental health visits, pharmacy fills, emergency department visits and hospitalizations), medication, productivity losses for parents GXR as an adjunctive therapy to long-acting stimulants is a cost-effective strategy compared to long-acting stimulant monotherapy in the treatment of children with ADHD. 100% cost-effective at WTP = $ 45,677/QALY. ICER = $21,669/QALY Good
 Schawo et al. [37] CUA Societal QALY (EQ5D) Treatment costs (drug and consultations), outpatient costs, institutionalization, psychoeducation, parent/teacher and home training, behavior therapy child, social skills training, physical therapy, criminal justice, educational support, special education, productivity losses parents, out-of pocket medical expenses For children responding suboptimally to treatment with IR-MPH, the beneficial effect of MPH-OROS on compliance is worth the money. The probability of OROS being cost-effective ranges between 93 and 99%. Cost savings of $7,938 Good
 van der Schans, et al. [38] CUA Societal QALY (TTO and VAS) Medication costs, other direct costs (medical consultation, behavioral intervention, and special education) and indirect costs (due to direct medical costs of the mother, absenteeism and presenteeism) Switching suboptimally treated patients from IR-MPH to MPH-OROS or Equasym XL/Medikinet CR led to per-patient cost-savings of $5,748 and $7,390, respectively, over a 10-year treatment span Good
 Erder et al. [41] CEA, CUA Third party payer Proportion of responders, defined as patients with 25% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score, QALY (EQ5D) Drug costs and other medical costs GXR is cost-effective compared with ATX for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. ICER: $12,357/QALY gained (WTP of $50,000/QALY); $1,005 per responder Moderate
 Sikirica et al. [39] CUA Third party payer QALY (TTO and VAS) Drug costs and other medical costs The adjunctive therapy of GXR with stimulants is a cost-effective treatment compared to stimulant monotherapy. ICER = $37,780/QALY. 94.6% probability of cost-effectiveness at a WTP of $50,000/ QALY Good
Autism spectrum disorders
 Byford et al. [42] CEA Societal Clinically meaningful improvement in ADOS-G social communication algorithm score Health care (intervention, speech and language, community health, meds, hospital-based services), education, childcare, social services, parental productivity losses, parental out-of-pocket expenses, informal care Non-significant improvements in outcome. Larger health, education and social services for PACT + TAU versus TAU. Total cost lower when burden on parents is included. No evidence for investment in PACT + TAU Good
 Penner et al. [43] CEA Societal Dependency-free life years (DFLYs)b Intervention costs, special education, special services at home, income support and healthcare, caregiver costs, productivity losses for children Pre-diagnosis ASD-targeted intervention may be associated with cost savings (between $21,011 and $52,985) compared to current Ontario service models Good

AAP atypical antipsychotics, ADHD attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, ADHD-RS-IV ADHD rating scale, ADOS-G autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic, ASD Autism spectrum disorder, ATX atomoxetine, CEA cost-effectiveness analysis, CLAS Child Life and Attention Skills, CMA cost-minimization analysis, CSI Child Symptom Inventory, CUA cost-utility analysis, EQ5D Euroqol 5 dimensions, GXR guanfacine extended release, HUI health utilities index, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, IR-MPH immediate-release methylphenidate, LDX Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, MPH-OROS methylphenidate osmotic-release oral system, NFPP New Forest Parenting Program, NHS National Health Service, PACT Pre-school Autism Communication Trial, PedsQL Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, PFT parent-focused treatment, QALY quality adjusted life year, SNAP-IV Swanson Nolan and Pelham, TAU treatment as usual, TTO time trade off, VAS visual analogue scale, WTP willingness-to-pay

aAll costs converted to 2020 US$ from original currency using a conversion rate based on Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) for gross domestic product from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/costconversion/default.aspx

bA DFLY was defined as a year of life with a similar level of independence as a typically developing individual

If more than one perspective, the broadest perspective was indicated