Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;260(12):3799–3807. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05697-4

Table 2.

Correlation between CST and BCVA by treatment group in VIBRANT trial. In VIBRANT, patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO received either laser at baseline or IAI 2q4 from baseline through week 24. Both treatment groups received IAI 2q8 from week 24 through week 52. 2q4, 2 mg every 4 weeks; 2q8, 2 mg every 8 weeks; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CI, confidence interval; CST, central subfield thickness; IAI, intravitreal aflibercept injection; r, correlation

Visit Laser/IAI IAI
n r (95% CI) P-value n r (95% CI) P-value
Correlation between absolute CST and absolute BCVA
  Baseline 90  −0.46 (−0.61, −0.27)  < 0.001 91  −0.41 (−0.56, −0.22)  < 0.001
  Week 12 83  −0.40 (−0.57, −0.20) 0.0002 88 0.13 (−0.08, 0.33) 0.22
  Week 24 81  −0.46 (−0.62, −0.27)  < 0.001 83 0.14 (−0.08, 0.35) 0.20
  Week 52 77 0.06 (−0.16, 0.28) 0.59 73 0.17 (−0.06, 0.39) 0.14
Correlation between changes in CST and changes in BCVA
  Week 12 83  −0.43 (−0.59, −0.24)  < 0.001 88  −0.34 (−0.51, −0.14) 0.001
  Week 24 81  −0.42 (−0.59, −0.22)  < 0.001 83  −0.32 (−0.50, −0.11) 0.003
  Week 52 77  −0.30 (−0.49, −0.08) 0.008 73  −0.36 (−0.54, −0.14) 0.002