Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 2;16:929687. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.929687

TABLE 2.

Fit statistics for all simulated models.

Study 1 group
Study 2 group
Study 1 subject
Study 2 subject
Study 1 Xval classification
Study 2 Xval classification
Model RMSE cAIC RMSE cAIC RMSE cAIC RMSE cAIC cAIC Overall Pair cAIC Overall Pair
P 0.00312 –6.33001 0.00198 –7.1133 0.00381 –6.1104 0.00237 –5.4655 –1.6882 23.39% 84.23% –1.3595 18.25% 72.11%
PI 0.00083 –6.41743 0.00073 –7.1847 0.00201 –6.1983 0.00130 –5.4930 –1.7201 35.94% 88.10% –1.3708 24.14% 74.59%
PD 0.00312 –6.32608 0.00197 –7.1110 0.00355 –6.1208 0.00234 –5.4644 –1.6870 26.82% 85.53% –1.3587 18.21% 72.11%
PID 0.00065 –6.41588 0.00071 –7.1820 0.00158 –6.2102 0.00120 –5.4926 –1.7206 38.76% 88.77% –1.3701 24.16% 74.58%
D1 0.00059 6.42106 0.00039 7.1932 0.00187 –6.2049 0.00112 –5.4950 –1.7228 35.70% 88.15% –1.3713 22.69% 73.66%
D2 0.00059 –6.41672 0.00039 –7.1901 0.00174 –6.2023 0.00100 –5.4960 –1.7187 35.72% 88.28% 1.3715 24.72% 74.68%
D3 0.00312 –6.32608 0.00197 –7.1110 0.00355 –6.1208 0.00234 –5.4644 –1.6870 26.82% 85.53% –1.3587 18.21% 72.11%
D4 0.00116 –6.40619 0.00083 –7.1780 0.00183 –6.1964 0.00145 –5.4848 –1.7157 37.75% 88.42% –1.3669 22.04% 73.25%
D5 0.00053 –6.41737 0.00026 –7.1921 0.00151 –6.2129 0.00105 –5.4941 1.7233 38.55% 88.74% –1.3706 23.07% 73.78%
D6 0.00052 –6.41321 0.00021 –7.1895 0.00137 –6.2106 0.00092 –5.4951 –1.7195 38.73% 88.89% –1.3708 25.56% 74.83%
D7 0.00046 –6.40946 0.00017 –7.1867 0.00113 –6.2103 0.00081 –5.4942 –1.7147 39.49% 89.00% –1.3697 25.65% 74.93%
D8 0.00052 –6.40886 0.00017 –7.1866 0.00117 –6.2093 0.00092 –5.4918 –1.7142 38.53% 88.78% –1.3688 23.70% 73.94%
D9 0.00052 –6.40451 0.00017 –7.1835 0.00103 –6.2065 0.00076 –5.4930 –1.7110 40.20% 89.18% –1.3689 26.05% 75.06%
D10 0.00048 –6.40055 0.00013 –7.1806 0.00100 –6.2014 0.00071 –5.4922 –1.7070 40.37% 89.14% –1.3679 26.12% 75.13%
D11 0.00104 –6.40902 0.00040 –7.1900 0.00147 6.2129 0.00097 5.4964 –1.7227 38.57% 88.93% –1.3713 25.38% 75.08%
D12 0.00051 –6.40890 0.00027 –7.1857 0.00111 –6.2110 0.00078 –5.4948 –1.7129 39.06% 88.94% –1.3699 25.70% 75.24%
D13 0.00051 –6.40889 0.00027 –7.1857 0.00116 –6.2099 0.00082 –5.4944 –1.7160 39.92% 89.03% –1.3698 25.07% 75.15%
D14 0.00051 –6.40454 0.00013 –7.1838 0.00105 –6.2064 0.00076 –5.4933 –1.7110 40.71% 89.18% –1.3690 25.01% 75.16%
D15 0.00035 –6.40165 0.00012 –7.1807 0.00093 –6.2027 0.00066 –5.4924 –1.7058 40.57% 89.22% –1.3682 26.32% 75.27%

Xval, cross-validation; RMSE, root-mean-square error; cAIC, corrected Akaike information criterion; Overall, overall accuracy (%); Pair, pairwise accuracy (%).

Boldface type indicates the model with lowest RMSE and cAIC for each study.

Blue shading indicates cAIC values that are within the cAIC threshold of the lowest cAIC value.