Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2022 May 16;53(9):4255–4265. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722001015

Table 3.

Statistically significant differences in age-adjusted prevalence estimates of positive SCOFF based on intersectional (“observed”) versus additive (“expected”) models

Difference in Observed Versus Expected Age-Adjusted Prevalence Estimate
Observed prevalence statistically significantly greater than expected based on each individual social identity
Hispanic/Latino bisexual men of lower SES 27.2% greater than expected
Asian/Asian American bisexual men of higher SES 12.9% greater than expected
Hispanic/Latino gay men of lower SES 10.7% greater than expected
White gay men of lower SES 10.3% greater than expected
White gay men of higher SES 9.5% greater than expected
White heterosexual women of higher SES 1.3% greater than expected

Observed prevalence statistically significantly lower than expected based on each individual social identity
Hispanic/Latina lesbian women of higher SES 29.2% lower than expected
Asian/Asian American lesbian women of lower SES 24.4% lower than expected
Black/African American lesbian women of higher SES 20.2% lower than expected
Hispanic/Latina bisexual women of higher SES 11.3% lower than expected
White lesbian women of lower SES 10.2% lower than expected
Asian/Asian American bisexual women of lower SES 9.6% lower than expected
White lesbian women of higher SES 8.3% lower than expected
White heterosexual men of higher SES 2.5% lower than expected

Note. SES = socioeconomic status. Within each section of the table, differences in observed versus expected age-adjusted prevalence estimates are listed in descending order by the magnitude of difference.