Table 3.
Statistically significant differences in age-adjusted prevalence estimates of positive SCOFF based on intersectional (“observed”) versus additive (“expected”) models
| Difference in Observed Versus Expected Age-Adjusted Prevalence Estimate | |
|---|---|
|
Observed prevalence statistically significantly greater than expected based on each individual social identity
| |
| Hispanic/Latino bisexual men of lower SES | 27.2% greater than expected |
| Asian/Asian American bisexual men of higher SES | 12.9% greater than expected |
| Hispanic/Latino gay men of lower SES | 10.7% greater than expected |
| White gay men of lower SES | 10.3% greater than expected |
| White gay men of higher SES | 9.5% greater than expected |
| White heterosexual women of higher SES | 1.3% greater than expected |
|
Observed prevalence statistically significantly lower than expected based on each individual social identity | |
| Hispanic/Latina lesbian women of higher SES | 29.2% lower than expected |
| Asian/Asian American lesbian women of lower SES | 24.4% lower than expected |
| Black/African American lesbian women of higher SES | 20.2% lower than expected |
| Hispanic/Latina bisexual women of higher SES | 11.3% lower than expected |
| White lesbian women of lower SES | 10.2% lower than expected |
| Asian/Asian American bisexual women of lower SES | 9.6% lower than expected |
| White lesbian women of higher SES | 8.3% lower than expected |
| White heterosexual men of higher SES | 2.5% lower than expected |
Note. SES = socioeconomic status. Within each section of the table, differences in observed versus expected age-adjusted prevalence estimates are listed in descending order by the magnitude of difference.