Table 3.

Identification of starch grains recovered from the studied sites.

Tool	Field number	Tool type	Starch Type										Total
			Aroid		Yam		Palm	Ginger	Millet	Acorn	Bean	Rice
			Ia	Ib	IIa	IIb	III	IV	V	VI	VII	VIII
Bai Ben site
1	01 BB H11 L3 a2: 141	Grinding stone	5		1		1		3				10
2	BB 99. TS2. T1 M1 L3. e2: 410	Muller/Pounder	11		6		1						18
3	BB 99. TS2. T1 L5 b4: 1242	Muller/Pounder	6		2		1	1					10
4	01 BB H11 L3 c2: 220	Grinding stone tool “Ha Long Mark”	1						1				2
5	01 BB H11 L3 b4. 87	Short axe	6		2	3							11
Total			29		11	3	3	1	4				51
Total %			56.86%		21.57%	5.88%	5.88%	1.96%	7.84%				100.00%
Bai Cat Don site
1	13 CD H1 L1 b3. 32	Grinding stone	1						1				2
2	13 CD H1 L1 b5	Grinding stone	6						3				9
3	03 CD H1 L4 A1: 94	Grinding stone	9	2	3				1	1			16
4	03 CD H1 L4 D5	Grinding stone	3				1						4
5	03 CD H1 L3 D2. 76	Grinding stone			1		1		2				4
6	03 CD H1 L3 D1	Grinding stone	1		2		2			1			6
7	13 CD H1 L1 a5.8	Muller/Pounder	1										1
8	03 CD H1 L4 A4	Pitted pebble			1	1			2				4
9	13 CD L1 a3. 56	Shouldered axe fragment							1		2		3
10	03 CD H1 L2 b2	Grinding stone tool “Ha Long Mark”	11						1				12
Total			32	2	7	1	4		11	2	2		61
Total %			52.46%	3.28%	11.48%	1.64%	6.56%		18.03%	3.28%	3.28%		100.00%
Trang Kenh site
1	35 D18 C	Grinding stone	6						4			5	15
2	H1 L7 d4 734 D18	Muller/Pounder	5					1	10			2	18
3	96 TK L3 (5) D4 552	Muller/Pounder							2				2
4	96 TK L5 (5) D622	Chopper	2										2
5	86 TK H1 L5 60	Adze	1										1
Total			14					1	16			7	38
Total %			36.84%					2.63%	42.11%			18.42%	100.00%