Table 4. GSI Post Hoc Comparisons Using HSD Test on Age, Sex and Income, in Period 1 and 2.
Participants’ characteristics | Period 1: GSI-27 |
Period 2: GSI-27 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | M | SD | |
Age | ||||
18-20 | 1.05 | 0.06 | 2.41 | 0.80 |
21-29 | 1.02 | 0.03 | 2.18 | 0.73 |
30-29 | 0.96 | 0.02 | 2.01 | 0.74 |
40-49 | 0.85 | 0.03 | 1.90 | 0.66 |
50-59 | 0.69 | 0.03 | 1.84 | 0.67 |
60 or more | 0.58 | 0.03 | 1.68 | 0.71 |
Sex | ||||
Men | 0.77 | 0.58 | 1.80 | 0.66 |
Women | 1.00 | 0.71 | 2.10 | 0.73 |
Income | ||||
Low | 0.98 | 0.71 | 2.06 | 0.69 |
Middle | 0.75 | 0.59 | 1.90 | 0.69 |
High | 0.74 | 0.59 | 1.87 | 0.66 |
Note. In Period 1, post hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for the 18-20 and 21-29 years old subgroups had significantly more symptoms than the 40-49, 50-59, and 60 plus years old subgroups. Also, the 40-49 years old subgroups had a higher GSI than the 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. In Period 2, the 18-20 years old subgroup had significantly more symptoms than 21-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. The 21-29 subgroup had significantly more symptoms than 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. Also, the 30-39 years old subgroup had a higher GSI than the 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. The 40-49 years old subgroup had more symptoms than the 60 plus subgroup.
In Period 1, post hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for the low-income participants had a significant difference with the middle and high-income participants. In Period 2, the low-income participants reported the highest GSI score. Low-income participants had a significant difference with the middle and high-income participants.